Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34817720›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2021

Communicating imaging findings in peritoneal mesothelioma: the impact of 'PAUSE' on surgical decision-making.

Anuradha Chandramohan, Nehal Shah, Andrew Thrower, Norman John Carr, Rohin Mittal, Faheez Mohamed, Brendan Moran

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anuradha ChandramohanChristian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India. anuradhachandramohan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9093-375X
Nehal ShahDepartment of Radiology, Basingstoke Hospital, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, UK.
Andrew ThrowerDepartment of Radiology, Basingstoke Hospital, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, UK.
Norman John CarrPeritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke Hospital, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, UK.
Rohin MittalChristian Medical College, Vellore, 632004, India.
Faheez MohamedPeritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke Hospital, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, UK.
Brendan MoranPeritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke Hospital, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, UK.
Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital · GBChristian Medical College, Vellore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The peritoneal cavity is the second commonest site of mesothelioma after the pleural cavity. There are five histological types of peritoneal mesothelioma with variable symptomatology, clinical presentation and prognosis. Cystic mesothelioma is a borderline malignant neoplasm with a favourable prognosis, well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma is generally a low-grade malignancy, and all other varieties such as epithelioid, sarcomatoid and biphasic mesothelioma are highly malignant types of peritoneal mesothelioma with poor prognosis. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma was considered inevitably fatal prior to the introduction of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in selected cases where long-term survival and cure could be achieved. However, the survival benefits following CRS and HIPEC mainly depend on completeness of cytoreduction, which come at the cost of high morbidity and potential mortality. Using the acronym 'PAUSE', we aimed at describing the key imaging findings that impact surgical decision-making in patients with peritoneal mesothelioma. PAUSE stands for peritoneal cancer index, ascites and abdominal wall disease, unfavourable sites of involvement, small bowel and mesenteric disease and extraperitoneal disease. Reporting components of 'PAUSE' is crucial for patient selection. Despite limitations of CT in accurately depicting the volume of disease, describing findings in terms of PAUSE plays an important role in excluding patients who might not benefit from CRS and HIPEC.

Indexed as

Complete cytoreductionImagingPAUSEPeritoneal mesotheliomaRadiological peritoneal cancer index

Identifiers

PMID34817720
PMCPMC8613330
OpenAlexW3214808797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.