ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2021
Subcortical Aphasia.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of Foxp2 expression in the thalamus of mice, rats, and macaques: implications for the evolution of language circuits.Brain structure & function · 2026Article
- Object Naming After Thalamic Damage: Evidence From a Large-Scale, Chronic-Phase Study of Left Hemisphere Stroke Survivors.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Spatial neglect after subcortical stroke may reflect cortico-cortical disconnection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Connectional Diaschisis and Normalization of Cortical Language Network Dynamics After Basal Ganglia and Thalamus Stroke.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Characteristics and prognosis of language impairment in subcortical aphasia of acute stroke patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Subcortical Aphasia: An Update.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024Review
- Multimodal study of multilevel pulvino-temporal connections: a new piece in the puzzle of lexical retrieval networks.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
- A modified neural circuit framework for semantic memory retrieval with implications for circuit modulation to treat verbal retrieval deficits.Brain and behavior · 2024Review
- Perfusion Status in Lacunar Stroke: A Pathophysiological Issue.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Possible Effects of Acupuncture in Poststroke Aphasia.Behavioural neurology · 2023Review
- Thalamic Aphasia: a Review.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022Review
- Constraint-induced Aphasia Therapy Improves the Use of Spoken Language and Word-finding Ability in Chronic Subcortical Aphasia: A Case Report.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2022Article
- The Progress of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Poststroke Aphasia.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewSubcortical structures have long been thought to play a role in language processing. Increasingly spirited debates on language studies, arising from as early as the nineteenth century, grew remarkably sophisticated as the years pass. In the context of non-thalamic aphasia, a few theoretical frameworks have been laid out. The disconnection hypothesis postulates that basal ganglia insults result in aphasia due to a rupture of connectivity between Broca and Wernicke's areas. A second viewpoint conjectures that the basal ganglia would more directly partake in language processing, and a third stream proclaims that aphasia would stem from cortical deafferentation. On the other hand, thalamic aphasia is more predominantly deemed as a resultant of diaschisis. This article reviews the above topics with recent findings on deep brain stimulation, neurophysiology, and aphasiology. RECENT
findingsThe more recent approach conceptualizes non-thalamic aphasias as the offspring of unpredictable cortical hypoperfusion. Regarding the thalamus, there is mounting evidence now pointing to leading contributions of the pulvinar/lateral posterior nucleus and the anterior/ventral anterior thalamus to language disturbances. While the former appears to relate to lexical-semantic indiscrimination, the latter seems to bring about a severe breakdown in word selection and/or spontaneous top-down lexical-semantic operations. The characterization of subcortical aphasias and the role of the basal ganglia and thalamus in language processing continues to pose a challenge. Neuroimaging studies have pointed a path forward, and we believe that more recent methods such as tractography and connectivity studies will significantly expand our knowledge in this particular area of aphasiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.