Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34817710›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2021

Subcortical Aphasia.

Marcia Radanovic, Victor N Almeida

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Subcortical Aphasia: An Update.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Thalamic Aphasia: a Review.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcia RadanovicLaboratorio de Neurociencias (LIM-27), Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785, SP, 05403-903, São Paulo, Brazil. marciaradanovic@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3256-6397
Victor N AlmeidaFaculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4493-1424
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSubcortical structures have long been thought to play a role in language processing. Increasingly spirited debates on language studies, arising from as early as the nineteenth century, grew remarkably sophisticated as the years pass. In the context of non-thalamic aphasia, a few theoretical frameworks have been laid out. The disconnection hypothesis postulates that basal ganglia insults result in aphasia due to a rupture of connectivity between Broca and Wernicke's areas. A second viewpoint conjectures that the basal ganglia would more directly partake in language processing, and a third stream proclaims that aphasia would stem from cortical deafferentation. On the other hand, thalamic aphasia is more predominantly deemed as a resultant of diaschisis. This article reviews the above topics with recent findings on deep brain stimulation, neurophysiology, and aphasiology. RECENT

findingsThe more recent approach conceptualizes non-thalamic aphasias as the offspring of unpredictable cortical hypoperfusion. Regarding the thalamus, there is mounting evidence now pointing to leading contributions of the pulvinar/lateral posterior nucleus and the anterior/ventral anterior thalamus to language disturbances. While the former appears to relate to lexical-semantic indiscrimination, the latter seems to bring about a severe breakdown in word selection and/or spontaneous top-down lexical-semantic operations. The characterization of subcortical aphasias and the role of the basal ganglia and thalamus in language processing continues to pose a challenge. Neuroimaging studies have pointed a path forward, and we believe that more recent methods such as tractography and connectivity studies will significantly expand our knowledge in this particular area of aphasiology.

Indexed as

AphasiaDiaschisisBasal GangliaHumansSemanticsThalamusAphasiaBasal gangliaLanguageSubcorticalThalamus

Identifiers

PMID34817710
OpenAlexW4200402139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.