Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34817282›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2021

A Rapid Drug Resistance Genotyping Workflow for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Using Targeted Isothermal Amplification and Nanopore Sequencing.

Harriet D Gliddon, Dan Frampton, Vanisha Munsamy, Jude Heaney, Thomas Pataillot-Meakin, Eleni Nastouli, Alexander S Pym, Adrie J C Steyn, Deenan Pillay, Rachel A McKendry

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Harriet D Gliddon *London Centre for Nanotechnology, Faculty of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Dan Frampton *Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Vanisha MunsamyAfrica Health Research Institute, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Jude HeaneyDepartment of Virology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Thomas Pataillot-MeakinDepartment of Virology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Eleni NastouliDepartment of Virology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Alexander S PymAfrica Health Research Institute, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Adrie J C SteynAfrica Health Research Institute, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Deenan PillayDivision of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rachel A McKendryLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, Faculty of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2018-6829
Africa Health Research Institute · ZAUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBLondon Centre for Nanotechnology · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Viral Genomics: evolution, spread, and host interactionsU19AI110818 · NIAID · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI SABETI, PARDIS CHRISTINE · 2014 to 2024
$66.5M
Medical Research Council MR/P024378/1NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200900018CNIAID NIH HHS U19 AI110818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) for tuberculosis (TB) requires weeks to yield results. Although molecular tests rapidly detect drug resistance-associated mutations (DRMs), they are not scalable to cover the full genome and the many DRMs that can predict resistance. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) methods are scalable, but if conducted directly on sputum, typically require a target enrichment step, such as nucleic acid amplification. We developed a targeted isothermal amplification-nanopore sequencing workflow for rapid prediction of drug resistance of TB isolates. We used recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) to perform targeted isothermal amplification (37°C for 90 min) of three regions within the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome, followed by nanopore sequencing on the MinION. We tested 29 mycobacterial genomic DNA extracts from patients with drug-resistant (DR) TB and compared our results to those of WGS by Illumina and phenotypic DST to evaluate the accuracy of prediction of resistance to rifampin and isoniazid. Amplification by RPA showed fidelity equivalent to that of high-fidelity PCR (100% concordance). Nanopore sequencing generated DRM predictions identical to those of WGS, with considerably faster sequencing run times of minutes rather than days. The sensitivity and specificity of rifampin resistance prediction for our workflow were 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.0 to 99.9%) and 100.0% (95% CI, 15.8 to 100.0%), respectively. For isoniazid resistance prediction, the sensitivity and specificity were 100.0% (95% CI, 86.3 to 100.0%) and 100.0% (95% CI, 39.8 to 100.0%), respectively. The workflow consumable costs per sample are less than £100. Our rapid and low-cost drug resistance genotyping workflow provides accurate prediction of rifampin and isoniazid resistance, making it appropriate for use in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAntitubercular AgentsGenotypeHumansIsoniazidMycobacterium tuberculosisNanopore SequencingPolymerase Chain ReactionRifampinSensitivity and SpecificitySputumTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantWorkflowAntitubercular AgentsIsoniazidRifampindrug resistanceisothermal amplificationnanopore sequencingnext-generation sequencingtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID34817282
PMCPMC8612157
OpenAlexW3216399018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.