ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022
4DCT and VMAT for lung patients with irregular breathing.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improved commissioning of lung stereotactic body radiotherapy using a customized respiratory motion Phantom: a single- institutional study.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- Optimization of image reconstruction technique for respiratory-gated lung stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment planning using four-dimensional CT: a phantom study.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
- Influence factor and mechanism of FLASH effect.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Improving the Feasibility of Mitigating Phase Errors in 4DCT caused by a Random Reference Breathing Pattern in the Quasar Phantom and the Role of Slice Thickness.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- 4DCT and VMAT for lung patients with irregular breathing.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIrregular breathing in lung cancer patients is a common contra-indication to 4D computerized tomography (4DCT), which may then limit radiotherapy treatment options. For irregular breathers, we investigated whether 3DCT or 4DCT (1) better represents tumor motion, (2) better represents average tumor densities, and (3) better allows for volumetric modulated arc threarpy (VMAT) plans delivered with acceptable dosimetric accuracy.
methodsTen clinical breathing traces were identified with irregularities in phase and amplitude, and fed to a programmable moving platform incorporating an anthropomorphic lung tumor phantom. 3DCT and 4DCT data resorted by phase (4DCT-P) and amplitude (4DCT-A) were acquired for each trace. Tumors were delineated by Hounsfield unit (HU) thresholding and apparent motion range assessed. HU profiles were extracted from each image and agreement with calculated expected profiles quantified using area-under-curve (AUC) scoring. Clinically representative VMAT plans were created for each image, delivered to the irregularly moving phantom, and measured with a small-volume ion chamber at the tumor center.
resultsMedian difference from expected tumor motion range for 3DCT, 4DCT-P, and 4DCT-A was 2.5 [1.6-3.6] cm, 1.1 [0.1-1.9] cm, and 1.3 [0.4-1.9] cm, respectively (p = 0.005, 4DCT-P vs. 3DCT). Median AUC scores (ideal = 0) for 3DCT, 4DCT-P, and 4DCT-A were 0.25 [0.14-0.49], 0.12 [0.05-0.42], and 0.13 [0.09-0.44], respectively (p = 0.005, 4DCT-P vs. 3DCT). Nine of ten 4DCT-P plans and all 4DCT-A plans measured within 2.5% of expected dose in the treatment planning system (TPS), compared with seven 3DCT plans.
conclusionFor the cases studied tumor motion range and average density was better represented with 4DCT compared with 3DCT, even in the presence of irregular breathing. 4DCT images allowed for delivery of VMAT plans with acceptable dosimetric accuracy. No significant differences were detected between phase and amplitude resorting. In combination with 4D cone beam imaging at treatment, our findings have given us confidence to introduce 4DCT and VMAT for lung radiotherapy patients with irregular breathing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.