Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34816546›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Tailored patient therapeutic educational interventions: A patient-centred communication model.

Laetitia Ricci, Julie Villegente, Déborah Loyal, Carole Ayav, Joëlle Kivits, Anne-Christine Rat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Validation of the Observational Assessment Tool for Tailoring (OATT).Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Patient education following vertebral fragility fracture: a scoping review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laetitia RicciCHRU-Nancy, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, CIC 1433 Clinical Epidemiology, Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6760-1674
Julie VillegenteCHRU-Nancy, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, CIC 1433 Clinical Epidemiology, Nancy, France.
Déborah LoyalUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, Nancy, France.
Carole AyavCHRU-Nancy, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, CIC 1433 Clinical Epidemiology, Nancy, France.
Joëlle KivitsUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, Nancy, France.
Anne-Christine RatUniversité de Lorraine, APEMAC, Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4319-8638
Inserm · FRInterdisciplinarité en Santé Publique Interventions et Instruments de mesure complexes – Région Est · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTailoring therapeutic education consists of adapting the intervention to patients' needs with the expectation that this individualization will improve the results of the intervention. Communication is the basis for any individualization process. To our knowledge, there is no guide or structured advice to help healthcare providers (HCPs) tailor patient education interventions.

objectivesWe used a data-driven qualitative analysis to (1) investigate the reasons why HCPs tailor their educational interventions and (2) identify how this tailoring is effectively conducted. The perspective aimed to better understand how to individualize therapeutic patient education and to disentangle the different elements to set up studies to investigate the mechanisms and effects of individualization.

designIndividual semistructured interviews with 28 HCPs involved in patient education were conducted. The present study complied with the COREQ criteria.

resultsWhy individualization is necessary: participants outlined that the person must be thought of as unique and that therapeutic education should be adapted to the patient's personality and cognitive abilities. The first step in the individualization process was formalized by an initial patient assessment. Several informal practices were identified: if needed, giving an individual time or involving a specific professional; eliciting individual objectives; reinforcing the relationship by avoiding asymmetrical posture; focusing on patients' concerns; leading sessions in pairs; and making the patient the actor of decisions.

conclusionFrom our thematic data analysis, a model for tailoring patient education interventions based on the Haes and Bensing medical communication framework is proposed. The present work paves the way for evaluation, then generation of recommendations and finally implementation of training for individualization in educational interventions. SHORT INFORMATIVE: Tailoring in therapeutic education consists of an adaptation to patients' needs. Communication is the basis for any individualization process. There is no model of patient-centred communication in educational interventions. From semistructured interviews with HCPs, we propose a patient-centred communication model for tailoring patient education intervention.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth PersonnelHumanshealthcare providershealth communicationinterviewssix-function modeltailored interventionthematic analysistherapeutic patient education

Identifiers

PMID34816546
PMCPMC8849242
OpenAlexW3216607361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.