ArticleStatistics in medicine2022
Feature selection and classification over the network with missing node observations.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian functional analysis for untargeted metabolomics data with matching uncertainty and small sample sizes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Risk factors assessment and a Bayesian network model for predicting ischemic stroke in patients with cardiac myxoma.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Jointly analyzing transcriptomic data and the existing biological networks can yield more robust and informative feature selection results, as well as better understanding of the biological mechanisms. Selecting and classifying node features over genome-scale networks has become increasingly important in genomic biology and genomic medicine. Existing methods have some critical drawbacks. The first is they do not allow flexible modeling of different subtypes of selected nodes. The second is they ignore nodes with missing values, very likely to increase bias in estimation. To address these limitations, we propose a general modeling framework for Bayesian node classification (BNC) with missing values. A new prior model is developed for the class indicators incorporating the network structure. For posterior computation, we resort to the Swendsen-Wang algorithm for efficiently updating class indicators. BNC can naturally handle missing values in the Bayesian modeling framework, which improves the node classification accuracy and reduces the bias in estimating gene effects. We demonstrate the advantages of our methods via extensive simulation studies and the analysis of the cutaneous melanoma dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.