Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34816382›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2022

Andrographis paniculata Formulations: Impact on Diterpene Lactone Oral Bioavailability.

João Paulo Loureiro Damasceno, Hemerson Silva da Rosa, Luciana Silva de Araújo, Niege Araçari Jacometti Cardoso Furtado

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring the clinical effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. An Innovative Method of Improving an Extract ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Development and Optimization ofPharmaceutics · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Lower Concentrations of Amphotericin B Combined withAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Antidiabetic effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

João Paulo Loureiro DamascenoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av. do Café, s/n, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-903, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2620-922X
Hemerson Silva da RosaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av. do Café, s/n, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-903, Brazil.
Luciana Silva de AraújoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av. do Café, s/n, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-903, Brazil.
Niege Araçari Jacometti Cardoso FurtadoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av. do Café, s/n, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-903, Brazil. niege@fcfrp.usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4775-8153
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 301924/2019-8Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior finance code 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2016/25201-7Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/16012-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diterpene lactones have been identified as active compounds in several medicinal plants, including Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Nees, which is a medicinal plant that has been used for centuries across the world. Andrographolide is the major diterpene from A. paniculata and the main bioactive constituent of this species. The effectiveness of diterpenes can be affected by factors that limit their oral bioavailability, such as their poor water solubility, slow dissolution rates, low gastrointestinal absorption, high chemical and metabolic instability, and rapid excretion. In this context, the purpose of the present review is to compile and compare literature data on the bioavailability of diterpene lactones from A. paniculata after oral administration in medicinal plant extracts or in their free forms and to highlight strategies that have been used to improve their oral bioavailability. Considering that medicinal plant extracts are commonly used as dried powder that is reconstituted in water before oral administration, novel pharmaceutical formulation strategies that are used to overcome difficulties with diterpene solubility are also compiled in this review. The use of self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems is a good strategy to enhance the dissolution and consequently the bioavailability of andrographolide after oral administration of A. paniculata extract formulations. On the other hand, herbosome technology, pH-sensitive nanoparticles, nanosuspensions, nanoemulsions, nanocrystal suspensions, nanocrystal-based solid dispersions, and solid dispersion systems are useful to formulate andrographolide in its free form and increase its oral bioavailability. The use of a suitable andrographolide delivery system is essential to achieve its therapeutic potential.

Indexed as

Andrographis paniculataAdministration, OralBiological AvailabilityDiterpenesDrug CompoundingHumansLactonesPhytotherapyPlant ExtractsPlants, MedicinalDiterpenesLactonesPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID34816382
PMCPMC8609994
OpenAlexW3214989511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.