Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34816341›Full record

SynthesisJournal of autism and developmental disorders2022

Inhibitory Control in Autism Spectrum Disorders: Meta-analyses on Indirect and Direct Measures.

Irene Tonizzi, David Giofrè, Maria Carmen Usai

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Irene TonizziDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Genoa, Corso Podestà 2, 16128, Genoa, Italy.
David GiofrèDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Genoa, Corso Podestà 2, 16128, Genoa, Italy.
Maria Carmen UsaiDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Genoa, Corso Podestà 2, 16128, Genoa, Italy. maria.carmen.usai@unige.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2172-7941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This manuscript aimed to advance our understanding of inhibitory control (IC) in autism spectrum disorders (ASD), adopting a meta-analytic multilevel approach. The first meta-analysis, on 164 studies adopting direct measures, indicated a significant small-to-medium (g = 0.484) deficit in the group with ASD (n = 5140) compared with controls (n = 6075). Similar effect sizes between response inhibition and interference control were found, but they were differentially affected by intellectual functioning and age. The second meta-analysis, on 24 studies using indirect measures, revealed a large deficit (g = 1.334) in the group with ASD (n = 985) compared with controls (n = 1300). Presentation format, intellectual functioning, and age were significant moderators. The effect of comorbidity with ADHD was not statistically significant. Implications are discussed for IC research and practice in autism.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityAutism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderCognitionComorbidityHumansASDAutismExecutive functionsInhibitionInterference controlMeta-analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.