Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34816322›Full record

ArticleBiological cybernetics2022

Geodesic-based distance reveals nonlinear topological features in neural activity from mouse visual cortex.

Kosio Beshkov, Paul Tiesinga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biological cybernetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Integrating Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches for Neural Classification.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kosio BeshkovNeuroinformatics Department, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7764-3763
Paul TiesingaNeuroinformatics Department, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4509-6870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasingly popular approach to the analysis of neural data is to treat activity patterns as being constrained to and sampled from a manifold, which can be characterized by its topology. The persistent homology method identifies the type and number of holes in the manifold, thereby yielding functional information about the coding and dynamic properties of the underlying neural network. In this work, we give examples of highly nonlinear manifolds in which the persistent homology algorithm fails when it uses the Euclidean distance because it does not always yield a good approximation to the true distance distribution of a point cloud sampled from a manifold. To deal with this issue, we instead estimate the geodesic distance which is a better approximation of the true distance distribution and can therefore be used to successfully identify highly nonlinear features with persistent homology. To document the utility of the method, we utilize a toy model comprised of a circular manifold, built from orthogonal sinusoidal coordinate functions and show how the choice of metric determines the performance of the persistent homology algorithm. Furthermore, we explore the robustness of the method across different manifold properties, like the number of samples, curvature and amount of added noise. We point out strategies for interpreting its results as well as some possible pitfalls of its application. Subsequently, we apply this analysis to neural data coming from the Visual Coding-Neuropixels dataset recorded at the Allen Institute in mouse visual cortex in response to stimulation with drifting gratings. We find that different manifolds with a non-trivial topology can be seen across regions and stimulus properties. Finally, we interpret how these changes in manifold topology along with stimulus parameters and cortical region inform how the brain performs visual computation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsVisual CortexAnimalsBrainMiceNeural Networks, ComputerGeodesicsNeural codingNeural manifoldsPersistent homologyTopological data analysisVisual processing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.