Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34816218›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2021

The Global Impact of COVID-19 on the Care of People With Endometriosis.

Lysia Demetriou, Emma Cox, Claire E Lunde, Christian M Becker, Adriana L Invitti, Beatriz Martínez-Burgo, Marina Kvaskoff, Kurtis Garbutt, Emma Evans, Elaine Fox and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endometriosis and COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Potential impact of COVID-19 pandemic on endometriosis.Reproductive and developmental medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Lysia DemetriouNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Emma CoxEndometriosis United Kingdom (UK), London, United Kingdom.
Claire E LundeNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christian M BeckerNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Adriana L InvittiNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Beatriz Martínez-BurgoNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Marina KvaskoffUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Univ. Paris-Sud, Inserm, Gustave Roussy, "Exposome and Heredity" Team, CESP, Villejuif, France.
Kurtis GarbuttNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Emma EvansOxford University Hosptials National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Elaine FoxDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Krina T ZondervanNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Katy VincentNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBCentre for Human Genetics · GBEndometriosis · GBNational Health Service · GBUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic condition affecting ~10% of women globally. Little is known about the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on their care. This brief report is aimed to explore the impact of COVID-19 on the care of people with endometriosis around the world, their priorities in relation to their clinical care during and coming out of the pandemic, and whether they believed that endometriosis makes them more vulnerable to COVID-19. An internet-based survey collected data in five languages between May 11, 2020, and June 8, 2020. Only participants with a surgical or radiological diagnosis of endometriosis aged 18 years or over were included. A total of 6,729 eligible respondents completed the survey with 80.7% [95% CI (79.7, 81.6)] reporting a negative impact on their care. This included difficulties obtaining medication (20.3%), cancelled/postponed gynaecology appointments (50.0%), and cancelled/postponed procedures (37.2%). More than half worried that their endometrioses make them more vulnerable to COVID-19 [54.2%; 95% CI (53.0, 55.4)]. The top three priorities were remarkably consistent around the world: contact with gynaecologists, knowing when procedures would be performed, and support with mental health (20.3% prioritising this aspect during the pandemic and 13.0% as restrictions begin to ease). This study shows the substantial impact the COVID-19 pandemic has had on people with endometriosis and describes how they would like care prioritised moving forwards. The findings regarding significant support needs for mental health add further weight to the growing recognition of attending to such issues as part of good patient-centred care.

Indexed as

COVID-19endometriosismental health supportprioritisationsurvey

Identifiers

PMID34816218
PMCPMC8594023
OpenAlexW3200471100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.