Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34816135›Full record

ArticleJAAD international2021

The Personalised Acne Care Pathway-Recommendations to guide longitudinal management from the Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts.

Jerry Tan, Andrew Alexis, Hilary Baldwin, Stefan Beissert, Vincenzo Bettoli, James Del Rosso, Brigitte Dréno, Linda Stein Gold, Julie Harper, Charles Lynde and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAAD international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Self-care methods use for acne treatment among health science students.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. What's New After NICE Acne Guidelines.Dermatology and therapy · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jerry TanWindsor Clinical Research Inc, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew AlexisWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Hilary BaldwinRobert Wood Johnson Medical Center, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Stefan BeissertDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Vincenzo BettoliDermatology Unit - Teaching Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
James Del RossoThomas Dermatology, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Brigitte DrénoDermato-cancérology Department, CHU Nantes, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Linda Stein GoldHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Julie HarperDermatology and Skin Care Center of Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Charles LyndeUniversity of Toronto, Department of Medicine, Markham, Ontario, Canada.
Diane ThiboutotDepartment of Dermatology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Philadelphia.
Jonathan WeissGeorgia Dermatology Partners, Snellville, Georgia.
Alison M LaytonHull York Medical School, University of York, York, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcne is a chronic disease with a varying presentation that requires long-term management. Despite this, the clinical guidelines for acne offer limited guidance to facilitate personalized or longitudinal management of patients.

objectivesTo generate recommendations to support comprehensive, personalized, long-term patient management that address all presentations of acne and its current and potential future burden.

methodsThe Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts panel consisted of 13 dermatologists who used a modified Delphi approach to reach consensus on statements related to longitudinal acne management. The consensus was defined as ≥75% voting "agree" or "strongly agree." All voting was electronic and blinded.

resultsKey management domains, consisting of distinct considerations, points to discuss with patients, and "pivot points" were identified and incorporated into the Personalised Acne Care Pathway. Long-term treatment goals and expectations and risk of (or fears about) sequelae are highlighted as particularly important to discuss frequently with patients. LIMITATIONS: Recommendations are based on expert opinion, which could potentially differ from patients' perspectives. Regional variations in health care systems may not have been captured.

conclusionsThe Personalised Acne Care Pathway provides practical recommendations to facilitate the longitudinal management of acne, which can be used by health care professionals to optimize and personalize care throughout the patient journey.

Indexed as

acne care pathwayacne guidelinesacne patient pathwayacne scarringacne sequelaeacne vulgarisconsensusDelphi processHCP, health care professionallongitudinal managementPACE, Personalising Acne: Consensus of ExpertsPACP, Personalised Acne Care Pathwaypersonalised acne care pathwaypersonalized careshared decision-makingtruncal acne

Identifiers

PMID34816135
PMCPMC8593752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.