Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34816013›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2021

Therapeutic efficacy of lenvatinib in nonviral unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Tetsu Tomonari, Yasushi Sato, Hironori Tanaka, Takeshi Mitsuhashi, Akihiro Hirao, Takahiro Tanaka, Tatsuya Taniguchi, Koichi Okamoto, Masahiro Sogabe, Hiroshi Miyamoto and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Evolving therapeutic landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tetsu TomonariDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8484-9866
Yasushi SatoDepartment of Community Medicine for Gastroenterology and Oncology Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima Japan.
Hironori TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4712-0192
Takeshi MitsuhashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Akihiro HiraoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Takahiro TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Tatsuya TaniguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Koichi OkamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Masahiro SogabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Hiroshi MiyamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Naoki MugurumaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Tetsuji TakayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Tokushima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the therapeutic effect of lenvatinib (LEN) in liver disease etiology, especially nonviral hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS AND

resultsSixty-seven patients with unresectable advanced HCC (u-HCC) treated with LEN and consisting of 26 hepatitis C virus (HCV), 19 hepatitis B virus (HBV), 11 alcohol, and 11 nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cases were retrospectively recruited. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine predictive factors for survival. The objective response rate in the nonviral (alcohol and NASH) group was higher than that in the viral group (59.1% [13/22] vs. 46.7% [21/45]). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the nonviral group than in the viral group (13.7 vs. 6.6 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.324; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.174-0.602;

conclusionOur results suggest that LEN is more effective against nonviral u-HCC than against viral u-HCC.

Indexed as

atezolizumabbevacizumablenvatinib

Identifiers

PMID34816013
PMCPMC8593789
OpenAlexW3208523563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.