ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2021
Impact of the revised hemodynamic definition on the diagnosis of precapillary pulmonary hypertension: a retrospective single-center study in China.
Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor biomarkers in evaluating the severity and prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: A comprehensive analysis.Clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Medical Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Current Approaches and Investigational Drugs.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Revising the hemodynamic criteria for pulmonary hypertension: A perspective from China.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the 6
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent right heart catheterization from January 2012 to December 2018. All included patients were reassessed according to the revised hemodynamic definition.
resultsA total of 1,251 patients were included for analysis, of whom 1,044 patients had precapillary PH and 182 patients had mPAP <25 mmHg. After applying the revised definition, 33 (18.1%) of 182 patients with mPAP <25 mmHg were reclassified as having PH. However, only 7 of these 33 patients had a pulmonary vascular resistance ≥3 wood units and could be considered to have precapillary PH, accounting for 0.7% of the existing precapillary PH population. More importantly, 12 patients with mPAP ≥25 mmHg were delisted from precapillary PH for pulmonary vascular resistance <3 wood units (5 patients from Group III, 4 patients from Group IV, 3 patients from Group V). Overall, there was a net 0.5% decrease [(12-7)/1044×100%] in the population with precapillary PH.
conclusionsThe revised hemodynamic definition had a minor impact on the diagnosis of precapillary PH. It should be noted that the revised definition would influence not only patients with mPAP =21-24 mmHg, but also patients with mPAP ≥25 mmHg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.