Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34815846›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal2021

Kidney tissue engineering using a well-preserved acellular rat kidney scaffold and mesenchymal stem cells.

Samira Shahraki, Maryam Moghaddam Matin, Alireza Ebrahimzadeh Bideskan, Mohammad Aslzare, Ahmad Reza Bahrami, Sara Hosseinian, Sonia Iranpour, Zahra Samadi Noshahr, Abolfazl Khajavi Rad

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samira ShahrakiDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Maryam Moghaddam MatinDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Alireza Ebrahimzadeh BideskanDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad AslzareUrology and Nephrology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Ahmad Reza BahramiDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Sara HosseinianDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Sonia IranpourDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Zahra Samadi NoshahrDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Abolfazl Khajavi RadDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRFerdowsi University of Mashhad · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to acquire an effective method for preparation of rat decellularized kidney scaffolds capable of supporting proliferation and differentiation of human adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) into kidney cells. We compared two detergents, the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and triton X-100 for decellularization. The efficiency of these methods was assessed by Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E), 4', 6 diamidino-2-phenylindole and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. In the next step, AD-MSCs were seeded into the SDS-treated scaffolds and assessed after three weeks of culture. Proliferation and differentiation of AD-MSCs into kidney-specific cell types were then analyzed by H&E and IHC staining. The histological examinations revealed that SDS was more efficient in removing kidney cells at all-time points compared to triton X-100. Also, in the SDS-treated sections the native extracellular matrix was more preserved than the triton-treated samples. Laminin was completely preserved during decellularization procedure using SDS. Cell attachment in the renal scaffold was observed after recellularization. Furthermore, differentiation of AD-MSCs into epithelial and endothelial cells was confirmed by expression of Na-K ATPase and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) in seeded rat renal scaffolds, respectively. Our findings illustrated that SDS was more effective for decellularization of rat kidney compared to triton X-100. We presented an optimized method for decellularization and recellularization of rat kidneys to create functional renal natural scaffolds. These natural scaffolds supported the growth of AD-MSCs and could also induce differentiation of these cells into epithelial and endothelial cells.

Indexed as

DecellularizationExtracellular matrix scaffoldKidneyMesenchymal stem cellsRecellularization

Identifiers

PMID34815846
PMCPMC8576151
OpenAlexW3203636503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.