ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2022
Current trends in gene therapy for retinal diseases (Review).
Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and Efficacy of Adeno-Associated Viral Gene Therapy in Patients With Retinal Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Pooled it
- Recent advances in treating age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy: Current therapies and emerging novel approaches.GeroScience · 2026Review
- Identification a Compact Promoter using a New Promoter Selection Strategy and Engineering Hybrid Pol II/III Enable Efficient Genome Editing in Human Retinal Ganglion Cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- AAV-mediated exon skipping therapy for Usher syndrome, type 2A.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026Article
- Review
- Non-Viral Delivery Systems to Transport Nucleic Acids for Inherited Retinal Disorders.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Challenges in AAV-Based Retinal Gene Therapies and the Role of Magnetic Nanoparticle Platforms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Unleashing the potential of CRISPR multiplexing: Harnessing Cas12 and Cas13 for precise gene modulation in eye diseases.Vision research · 2023Review
- Elevated Intraocular Pressure and Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy: Genes to Disease Mechanisms, Therapeutic Drugs, and Gene Therapies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The eye is considered an effective target for genetic therapy, as it has a privileged immune status, it is easily accessed for medication delivery and it is affected by a number of inherited disorders. In particular, the retina is considered for gene therapy due to the fact that it can be visualized with ease, it does not have lymphatic vessels, nor a direct blood network for the outer layers and its cells do not divide after birth, and thus transgene expression is not affected. As gene therapy is currently on a continuously progressive development trend, this emerging field of gene manipulation techniques has yielded promising results. This involves the development of treatments for a number of debilitating and blinding diseases, which were to date considered intractable. However, numerous unanswered questions remain as regards the long-term efficacy and safety profile of these treatments. The present review article discusses the current research status regarding genetic manipulation techniques aimed at addressing visual impairment related to retinal disorders, both inherited and degenerative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.