Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34815750›Full record

ReviewEuropean cardiology2021

Levosimendan in Europe and China: An Appraisal of Evidence and Context.

Xiangqing Kong, Xinqun Hu, Baotong Hua, Francesco Fedele, Dimitrios Farmakis, Piero Pollesello

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bibliometric analysis of levosimendan.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Xiangqing KongFirst Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University Nanjing, China.
Xinqun HuSecond Xiangya Hospital, Zhongnan University Changsha, China.
Baotong HuaFirst Affiliated Hospital, Kunming Medical University Kunming, China.
Francesco FedeleDepartment of Clinical, Internal, Anaesthesiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, University 'La Sapienza' Rome, Italy.
Dimitrios FarmakisUniversity of Cyprus Medical School Nicosia, Cyprus.
Piero PolleselloCritical Care, Orion Pharma Espoo, Finland.
Central South University · CNKunming Medical University · CNNanjing Medical University · CNOrion Corporation (Finland) · FISapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Cyprus · CY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The calcium sensitiser levosimendan (SIMDAX; Orion Pharma) has been in clinical use for the management of acute heart failure and a range of related syndromes in many countries around the world for two decades. More recently, levosimendan has become available in China. The authors have examined the profile of levosimendan in clinical trials conducted inside and outside China and grouped the findings under six headings: effects on haemodynamics, effects on natriuretic peptides, effect on symptoms of heart failure, renal effects, effect on survival, and safety profile. Their conclusions are that under each of these headings there are reasonable grounds to expect that the effects and clinical benefits established in trials and with wider clinical use in Europe and elsewhere will accrue also to Chinese patients. Therefore, the authors are confident that global experience with levosimendan provides a reliable guide to its optimal use and likely therapeutic effects in patients in China.

Indexed as

acute heart failurecalcium sensitisationChinahaemodynamicsLevosimendanrandomised controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID34815750
PMCPMC8591618
OpenAlexW3211630248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.