Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34815739›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2021

On the need for integrating cancer into the One Health perspective.

Antoine M Dujon, Joel S Brown, Delphine Destoumieux-Garzón, Marion Vittecoq, Rodrigo Hamede, Aurélie Tasiemski, Justine Boutry, Sophie Tissot, Catherine Alix-Panabieres, Pascal Pujol and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Approaches and methods to study wildlife cancer.The Journal of animal ecology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. De novo evolution of transmissible tumours in hydra.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Antoine M DujonCREEC/CANECEV (CREES) Montpellier France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1579-9156
Joel S BrownDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa Florida USA.
Delphine Destoumieux-GarzónIHPE Université de Montpellier CNRS Ifremer Université de Perpignan Via Domitia Montpellier France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8793-9138
Marion VittecoqCREEC/CANECEV (CREES) Montpellier France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8930-6051
Rodrigo HamedeSchool of Natural Sciences University of Tasmania Hobart Tas. Australia.
Aurélie TasiemskiUniv. Lille CNRS Inserm CHU Lille Institut Pasteur de Lille U1019-UMR9017-CIIL-Centre d'Infection et d'Immunité de Lille Lille France.
Justine BoutryCREEC/CANECEV (CREES) Montpellier France.
Sophie TissotCREEC/CANECEV (CREES) Montpellier France.
Catherine Alix-PanabieresCREEC/CANECEV (CREES) Montpellier France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6401-2903
Pascal PujolCREEC/CANECEV (CREES) Montpellier France.
François RenaudCREEC/CANECEV (CREES) Montpellier France.
Frédéric SimardMIVEGEC Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD Montpellier France.
Benjamin RocheCREEC/CANECEV (CREES) Montpellier France.
Beata UjvariSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences Centre for Integrative Ecology Deakin University Waurn Ponds Vic. Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2391-2988
Frédéric ThomasCREEC/CANECEV (CREES) Montpellier France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2238-1978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent pandemics have highlighted the urgency to connect disciplines studying animal, human, and environment health, that is, the "One Health" concept. The One Health approach takes a holistic view of health, but it has largely focused on zoonotic diseases while not addressing oncogenic processes. We argue that cancers should be an additional key focus in the One Health approach based on three factors that add to the well-documented impact of humans on the natural environment and its implications on cancer emergence. First, human activities are oncogenic to other animals, exacerbating the dynamics of oncogenesis, causing immunosuppressive disorders in wildlife with effects on host-pathogen interactions, and eventually facilitating pathogen spillovers. Second, the emergence of transmissible cancers in animal species (including humans) has the potential to accelerate biodiversity loss across ecosystems and to become pandemic. It is crucial to understand why, how, and when transmissible cancers emerge and spread. Third, translating knowledge of tumor suppressor mechanisms found across the Animal Kingdom to human health offers novel insights into cancer prevention and treatment strategies.

Indexed as

cancercomparative oncologyinfectious diseasesOne HealthPeto’s paradox

Identifiers

PMID34815739
PMCPMC8591323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.