Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34815554›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based dentistry2021

Gingival biotype as an indicator for the buccal bone thickness - a systematic review of the literature.

Raghavendra Vamsi Anegundi, Santhosh B Shenoy, Anahita Punj

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raghavendra Vamsi AnegundiPostgraduate Student, Department of Periodontics, Nitte (Deemed to be University), AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, 575018, India.
Santhosh B ShenoyAdditional Professor, Department of Periodontics, Nitte (Deemed to be University), AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, 575018, India. drsanthoshshenoy@nitte.edu.in.
Anahita PunjSenior Lecturer, Army College of Dental Sciences, Secunderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction A relationship between thin gingiva and thin buccal bone has been proposed but concrete evidence for this is lacking. This study was undertaken to assess the reliability of measuring gingival thickness in estimating the buccal bone thickness.Objectives To answer the following PICO question: do periodontally healthy individuals exhibit any correlation between gingival biotype and buccal/labial/facial bone thickness?Data sources and selection An electronic search was performed in PubMed and Embase databases. English language articles that have met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. Only observational studies were considered. Since the studies have demonstrated heterogeneity, conducting a meta-analysis was not possible, so the results were synthesised using a vote counting method and narrative synthesis.Data synthesis After screening the titles and abstracts, 13 studies which met the study criteria were included in the systematic review. Out of these 13 studies, nine studies assessed only the maxillary anterior/premolars; one study assessed the mandibular anterior, and three studies assessed both maxillary and mandibular anterior/premolars.Conclusions The findings of this systematic review indicated that the gingival biotype may be a reliable indicator for estimating the thickness of buccal bone in maxillary anterior. However, its relation to the buccal bone thickness in mandible is unclear.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.