Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34815516›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2022

Comparing cord blood transplantation and matched related donor transplantation in non-remission acute myeloid leukemia.

Yoshimitsu Shimomura, Tomotaka Sobue, Shigeki Hirabayashi, Tadakazu Kondo, Shohei Mizuno, Junya Kanda, Takahiro Fujino, Keisuke Kataoka, Naoyuki Uchida, Tetsuya Eto and 15 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Yoshimitsu ShimomuraDepartment of Hematology, Kobe City Hospital Organization Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan. shimomura_0119@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1018-9508
Tomotaka SobueDepartment of Environmental Medicine and Population Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.
Shigeki HirabayashiDivision of Precision Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6684-9432
Tadakazu KondoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8959-6271
Shohei MizunoDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4405-8808
Junya KandaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6704-3633
Takahiro FujinoDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7817-093X
Keisuke KataokaDivision of Hematology and Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoyuki UchidaDepartment of Hematology, Federation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Associations Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5952-5926
Tetsuya EtoDepartment of Hematology, Hamanomachi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shigesaburo MiyakoshiDepartment of Hematology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masatsugu TanakaDepartment of Hematology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Kanagawa, Japan.
Toshiro KawakitaDepartment of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hisayuki YokoyamaDepartment of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan.
Noriko DokiHematology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8661-3179
Kaito HaradaDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8462-7550
Atsushi WakeDepartment of Hematology, Federation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Associations, Toranomon Hospital, Kajigaya, Kawasaki, Japan.
Shuichi OtaDepartment of Hematology, Sapporo Hokuyu Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3631-244X
Satoru TakadaLeukemia Research Center, Saiseikai Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan.
Satoshi TakahashiDivision of Molecular Therapy, The Advanced Clinical Research Center, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takafumi KimuraPreparation Department, Japanese Red Cross Kinki Block Blood Center, Ibaraki, Japan.
Makoto OnizukaDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3864-0823
Takahiro FukudaDepartment of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiko AtsutaJapanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4404-2870
Masamitsu YanadaDepartment of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1602-9775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cord blood transplantation (CBT) is an alternative donor transplantation method and has the advantages of rapid availability and the possibility of inducing a more potent graft-versus-leukemia effect, leading to a lower relapse rate for patients with non-remission relapse and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML). This study aimed to investigate the impact of CBT, compared to human leukocyte antigen-matched related donor transplantation (MRDT). This study included 2451 adult patients with non-remission R/R AML who received CBT (1738 patients) or MRDT (713 patients) between January 2009 and December 2018. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and the prognostic impact of CBT were evaluated using a propensity score (PS) matching analysis. After PS matching, the patient characteristics were well balanced between the groups. The five-year PFS was 25.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.2-29.5%) in the CBT group and 18.1% (95% CI: 14.5-22.0%) in the MRDT group (P = 0.009). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.69-1.00, P = 0.045); this was due to a more pronounced decrease in the relapse rate (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69-0.89, P < 0.001) than an increase in the NRM (1.42, 1.15-1.76, P = 0.001). In this population, CBT was associated with a better 5-year PFS than MRDT after allogeneic HSCT.

Indexed as

Cord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationGraft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAdultHumansRetrospective StudiesTransplantation Conditioning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.