Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34815464›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Assessment of CT to CBCT contour mapping for radiomic feature analysis in prostate cancer.

Ryder M Schmidt, Rodrigo Delgadillo, John C Ford, Kyle R Padgett, Matthew Studenski, Matthew C Abramowitz, Benjamin Spieler, Yihang Xu, Fei Yang, Nesrin Dogan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ryder M SchmidtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Rodrigo DelgadilloDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
John C FordDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Kyle R PadgettDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Matthew StudenskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Matthew C AbramowitzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Benjamin SpielerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Yihang XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Fei YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Nesrin DoganDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA. ndogan@med.miami.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study provides a quantitative assessment of the accuracy of a commercially available deformable image registration (DIR) algorithm to automatically generate prostate contours and additionally investigates the robustness of radiomic features to differing contours. Twenty-eight prostate cancer patients enrolled on an institutional review board (IRB) approved protocol were selected. Planning CTs (pCTs) were deformably registered to daily cone-beam CTs (CBCTs) to generate prostate contours (auto contours). The prostate contours were also manually drawn by a physician. Quantitative assessment of deformed versus manually drawn prostate contours on daily CBCT images was performed using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance-to-agreement (MDA), difference in center-of-mass position (ΔCM) and difference in volume (ΔVol). Radiomic features from 6 classes were extracted from each contour. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and mean absolute percent difference in radiomic feature-derived data (mean |%Δ|RF) between auto and manual contours were calculated. The mean (± SD) DSC, MDA, ΔCM and ΔVol between the auto and manual prostate contours were 0.90 ± 0.04, 1.81 ± 0.47 mm, 2.17 ± 1.26 mm and 5.1 ± 4.1% respectively. Of the 1,010 fractions under consideration, 94.8% of DIRs were within TG-132 recommended tolerance. 30 radiomic features had a CCC > 0.90 and 21 had a mean |%∆|RF < 5%. Auto-propagation of prostate contours resulted in nearly 95% of DIRs within tolerance recommendations of TG-132, leading to the majority of features being regarded as acceptably robust. The use of auto contours for radiomic feature analysis is promising but must be done with caution.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID34815464
PMCPMC8610973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.