Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34815453›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Variability in biopsy quality informs translational research applications in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Kelley Weinfurtner, Joshua Cho, Daniel Ackerman, James X Chen, Abashai Woodard, Wuyan Li, David Ostrowski, Michael C Soulen, Mandeep Dagli, Susan Shamimi-Noori and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kelley WeinfurtnerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Joshua ChoPenn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Daniel AckermanPenn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
James X ChenVascular & Interventional Specialists of Charlotte Radiology, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Abashai WoodardDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Wuyan LiPenn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David OstrowskiPenn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michael C SoulenDivision of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mandeep DagliDivision of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Susan Shamimi-NooriDivision of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jeffrey MondscheinDivision of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Deepak SudheendraDivision of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
S William StavropoulosDivision of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Shilpa ReddyDivision of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jonas RedmondDivision of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Tamim KhaddashDivision of Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Darshana JhalaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Evan S SiegelmanDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Emma E FurthDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Stephen J HuntPenn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gregory J NadolskiPenn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David E KaplanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Terence P F GadePenn Image-Guided Interventions Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. tgade@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · USOncology Specialists of Charlotte · USPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA TRAINING IN GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007066 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JONATHAN P KATZ · 1986 to 2026
$11.7M
Cross-comparison of patient-derived xenografts and derivative organoids and cell lines for translational research in hepatocellular carcinomaI01CX001933 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI GADE, TERENCE P · 2020 to 2023
–
CSRD VA I01 CX001933NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007066NIH HHS T32-DK007066Penn Center for Precision Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Accelerator GrantVA CSR&D I01 CX-001933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of precision medicine, biopsies are playing an increasingly central role in cancer research and treatment paradigms; however, patient outcomes and analyses of biopsy quality, as well as impact on downstream clinical and research applications, remain underreported. Herein, we report biopsy safety and quality outcomes for percutaneous core biopsies of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) performed as part of a prospective clinical trial. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of HCC were enrolled in a prospective cohort study for the genetic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling of HCC at two academic medical centers from April 2016 to July 2020. Under image guidance, 18G core biopsies were obtained using coaxial technique at the time of locoregional therapy. The primary outcome was biopsy quality, defined as tumor fraction in the core biopsy. 56 HCC lesions from 50 patients underwent 60 biopsy events with a median of 8 core biopsies per procedure (interquartile range, IQR, 7-10). Malignancy was identified in 45/56 (80.4%, 4 without pathology) biopsy events, including HCC (40/56, 71.4%) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) or combined HCC-CCA (5/56, 8.9%). Biopsy quality was highly variable with a median of 40% tumor in each biopsy core (IQR 10-75). Only 43/56 (76.8%) and 23/56 (41.1%) samples met quality thresholds for genomic or metabolomic/proteomic profiling, respectively, requiring expansion of the clinical trial. Overall and major complication rates were 5/60 (8.3%) and 3/60 (5.0%), respectively. Despite uniform biopsy protocol, biopsy quality varied widely with up to 59% of samples to be inadequate for intended purpose. This finding has important consequences for clinical trial design and highlights the need for quality control prior to applications in which the presence of benign cell types may substantially alter findings.

Indexed as

AgedBiopsyCarcinoma, HepatocellularFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleProspective StudiesSpecimen HandlingTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID34815453
PMCPMC8611010
OpenAlexW3216568335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.