Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34815426›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Contact calls in woodpeckers are individually distinctive, show significant sex differences and enable mate recognition.

Ewa Węgrzyn, Wiktor Węgrzyn, Konrad Leniowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ewa WęgrzynInstitute of Biology & Biotechnology, University of Rzeszów, Rejtana 16C, 35-959, Rzeszów, Poland.
Wiktor WęgrzynFaculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lodz, Pl. gen. J. Hallera 1, 90-647, Łódź, Poland.
Konrad LeniowskiInstitute of Biology & Biotechnology, University of Rzeszów, Rejtana 16C, 35-959, Rzeszów, Poland. songbird.konrad@gmail.com.
Rzeszów University · PLMedical University of Lodz · PL

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2017/01/X/NZ8/00074Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2018/02/X/NZ8/00042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vocal communication of woodpeckers has been relatively little studied so far, mostly because majority of species use drumming to communicate. Our recent study on the Middle Spotted Woodpecker revealed that a call which is specific for floaters is individually distinctive and functions as a vocal signature of unpaired individuals. The aim of the current study is to investigate whether a contact call of paired territory owners of the same species enables discrimination of individuals and their sex. Acoustic analyses revealed that the call is individually distinctive and experimental approach confirmed that woodpeckers are able to distinguish between a contact call of their partner and a stranger. We also found that the contact call shows significant sex differences. Interestingly, the acoustic parameter enabling sex identification is different than the parameters coding individual variability of the call. The design of a call so that its first part would code the identity of an individual and the second part would code its sex presents an effective and fine-tuned communication system. The results of our study also suggest that the contact call of paired Middle Spotted Woodpeckers may be useful for conservation biologists as a tool supporting other census methods.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationReproductionAcousticsAnimalsAuditory PerceptionBirdsFemaleMaleRecognition, PsychologySex FactorsSexual Behavior, AnimalVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID34815426
PMCPMC8611044
OpenAlexW3217519998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.