Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34815338›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Neural networks to learn protein sequence-function relationships from deep mutational scanning data.

Sam Gelman, Sarah A Fahlberg, Pete Heinzelman, Philip A Romero, Anthony Gitter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Supervised learning of protein variant effects across large-scale mutagenesis datasets.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sam GelmanDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.ORCID 0000-0001-9537-0976
Sarah A FahlbergDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.
Pete HeinzelmanDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.ORCID 0000-0002-5588-3731
Philip A RomeroDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.ORCID 0000-0002-2586-7263
Anthony GitterDepartment of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706.ORCID 0000-0002-5324-9833

Funding

Institutional Training in the Genomic SciencesT32HG002760 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Qiongshi Lu · 2003 to 2026
$17.7M
A Machine Learning Platform for Adaptive Chemical ScreeningR01GM135631 · NIGMS · MORGRIDGE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH, INC. · PI GITTER, ANTHONY JAMES · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
Data-driven analysis of protein structure, function, and regulationR35GM119854 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ROMERO, PHILIP ANTHONY · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002760NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM135631NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mapping from protein sequence to function is highly complex, making it challenging to predict how sequence changes will affect a protein's behavior and properties. We present a supervised deep learning framework to learn the sequence-function mapping from deep mutational scanning data and make predictions for new, uncharacterized sequence variants. We test multiple neural network architectures, including a graph convolutional network that incorporates protein structure, to explore how a network's internal representation affects its ability to learn the sequence-function mapping. Our supervised learning approach displays superior performance over physics-based and unsupervised prediction methods. We find that networks that capture nonlinear interactions and share parameters across sequence positions are important for learning the relationship between sequence and function. Further analysis of the trained models reveals the networks' ability to learn biologically meaningful information about protein structure and mechanism. Finally, we demonstrate the models' ability to navigate sequence space and design new proteins beyond the training set. We applied the protein G B1 domain (GB1) models to design a sequence that binds to immunoglobulin G with substantially higher affinity than wild-type GB1.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceBiochemical PhenomenaDeep LearningMachine LearningMutationNeural Networks, ComputerProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinStructure-Activity RelationshipProteinsconvolutional neural networkdeep learningprotein engineering

Identifiers

PMID34815338
PMCPMC8640744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.