Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34814885›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2021

Complementary medicine in Germany: a multi-centre cross-sectional survey on the usage by and the needs of patients hospitalized in university medical centers.

Ann-Kathrin Lederer, Alexandra Baginski, Lena Raab, Stefanie Joos, Jan Valentini, Carina Klocke, Yvonne Samstag, Katrin Hübner, Ivana Andreeva, Thomas Simmet and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Muslim pilgrims' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding complementary and alternative medicine (CAM); a study conducted during Hajj season.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. [How Common are Complementary Medicine Procedures in Bavarian Acute Care Hospitals? Results of A Bavarian-wide Website Screening].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ann-Kathrin LedererCenter for Complementary Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Theodor von Frerichs Haus, Sir-Hans-A.-Krebs-Straße, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Alexandra BaginskiCenter for Complementary Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Theodor von Frerichs Haus, Sir-Hans-A.-Krebs-Straße, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Lena RaabCenter for Complementary Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Theodor von Frerichs Haus, Sir-Hans-A.-Krebs-Straße, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Stefanie JoosInstitute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Jan ValentiniInstitute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Carina KlockeInstitute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Yvonne SamstagInstitute of Immunology, Section Molecular Immunology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katrin HübnerInstitute of Immunology, Section Molecular Immunology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ivana AndreevaInstitute of Immunology, Section Molecular Immunology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas SimmetInstitute of Pharmacology of Natural Products & Clinical Pharmacology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Tatiana SyrovetsInstitute of Pharmacology of Natural Products & Clinical Pharmacology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Susanne HafnerInstitute of Pharmacology of Natural Products & Clinical Pharmacology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Anna FreisingerInstitute of Pharmacology of Natural Products & Clinical Pharmacology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Maximilian Andreas StorzCenter for Complementary Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Theodor von Frerichs Haus, Sir-Hans-A.-Krebs-Straße, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Roman HuberCenter for Complementary Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Theodor von Frerichs Haus, Sir-Hans-A.-Krebs-Straße, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. roman.huber@uniklinik-freiburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe results of recent surveys indicate that more than 50% of the German population has experience with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) or uses CAM regularly. This study investigated the CAM usage and CAM-related needs of hospitalized patients at university medical centres in the state of Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

methodsA multi-centre, paper-based, pseudonymous survey was carried out by the members of the Academic Centre for Complementary and Integrative Medicine. Patients of all ages, regardless of sex, diagnosis and treatment, who were hospitalized in the Department of Cardiology, Gastroenterology, Oncology, Gynaecology or Surgery at the university medical centres in Freiburg, Heidelberg, Tübingen and Ulm were eligible for inclusion.

resultsOf the 1275 eligible patients, 67% (n = 854) consented to participate in the survey. Forty-eight percent of the study participants stated that they were currently using CAM. The most frequently used therapies were exercise (63%), herbal medicine (54%) and dietary supplements (53%). Only 16% of the patients discussed CAM usage with their attending physician. Half of the patients (48%) were interested in CAM consultations. More than 80% of the patients desired reliable CAM information and stated that physicians should be better informed about CAM.

conclusionsThe frequency of CAM usage and the need for CAM counselling among hospitalized patients at university medical centres in Baden-Württemberg are high. To better meet patients' needs, CAM research and physician education should be intensified.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trial register ( DRKS00015445 ).

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersHospitalizationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComplementary TherapiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAttitudesComplementary therapiesHealth knowledgePracticeSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34814885
PMCPMC8609851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.