Trial reportBMC neurology2021
Evaluating dopamine transporter imaging as an enrichment biomarker in a phase 2 Parkinson's disease trial.
Trial report in BMC neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03318523 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study, With an Active-Treatment Dose-Blinded Period, to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of BIIB054 in Subjects With Parkinson's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study, With an Active-Treatment Dose-Blinded Period, to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of BIIB054 in Subjects With Parkinson's Disease
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunization targeting diseased proteins in synucleinopathy and tauopathy: insights from clinical trials.Translational neurodegeneration · 2025Review
- Review
- Longitudinal Assessment of Parkinson's Motor Symptoms and Dopaminergic Dysfunction Patterns Using DaTSCAN.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2025Article
- An update on immune-based alpha-synuclein trials in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Preclinical evaluation of [EJNMMI research · 2024Article
- Review
- How should we be using biomarkers in trials of disease modification in Parkinson's disease?Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Imaging Dopaminergic Neurotransmission in Neurodegenerative Disorders.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022Article
- Prodromal Parkinson's disease: hype or hope for disease-modification trials?Translational neurodegeneration · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDopamine transporter single-photon emission computed tomography (DaT-SPECT) can quantify the functional integrity of the dopaminergic nerve terminals and has been suggested as an imaging modality to verify the clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD). Depending on the stage of progression, approximately 5-15% of participants clinically diagnosed with idiopathic PD have been observed in previous studies to have normal DaT-SPECT patterns. However, the utility of DaT-SPECT in enhancing early PD participant selection in a global, multicenter clinical trial of a potentially disease-modifying therapy is not well understood.
methodsThe SPARK clinical trial was a phase 2 trial of cinpanemab, a monoclonal antibody against alpha-synuclein, in participants with early PD. DaT-SPECT was performed at screening to select participants with DaT-SPECT patterns consistent with degenerative parkinsonism. Acquisition was harmonised across 82 sites. Images were reconstructed and qualitatively read at a central laboratory by blinded neuroradiologists for inclusion prior to automated quantitative analysis.
resultsIn total, 482 unique participants were screened between January 2018 and May 2019; 3.8% (15/398) of imaged participants were excluded owing to negative DaT-SPECT findings (i.e., scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficit [SWEDD]).
conclusionA smaller proportion of SPARK participants were excluded owing to SWEDD status upon DaT-SPECT screening than has been reported in prior studies. Further research is needed to understand the reasons for the low SWEDD rate in this study and whether these results are generalisable to future studies. If supported, the radiation risks, imaging costs, and operational burden of DaT-SPECT for enrichment may be mitigated by clinical assessment and other study design aspects.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03318523 . Date submitted: October 19, 2017. First Posted: October 24, 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.