Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34814795›Full record

ArticleBioengineered2021

Advances in biomaterial production from animal derived waste.

Ayon Tarafdar, Vivek Kumar Gaur, Neha Rawat, Pratik Ramesh Wankhade, Gyanendra Kumar Gaur, Mukesh Kumar Awasthi, Narashans Alok Sagar, Ranjna Sirohi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineered, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Transforming meat waste into sustainable corneal keratoplasty models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. From waste to wealth: Repurposing slaughterhouse waste for xenotransplantation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ayon TarafdarLivestock Production and Management Section, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4769-3145
Vivek Kumar GaurEnvironment Toxicology Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research, Lucknow, India.
Neha RawatDepartment of Food Science and Technology, College of Agriculture, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India.
Pratik Ramesh WankhadeLivestock Production and Management Section, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Gyanendra Kumar GaurLivestock Production and Management Section, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Mukesh Kumar AwasthiCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&f University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province, China.
Narashans Alok SagarDivision of Livestock Products Technology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ranjna SirohiDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.
Indian Veterinary Research Institute · INGovind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology · INIndian Institute of Toxicology Research · INKorea University · KRNorthwest A&F University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal derived waste, if not disposed properly, could pose a threat to the environment and its inhabitants. Recent advancements in biotechnological and biomedical interventions have enabled us to bioengineer these valuable waste substrates into biomaterials with diversified applications. Rearing and processing of poultry, cattle, sheep, goat, pig, and slaughterhouse waste can aid in effective waste valorization for the fabrication of biopolymers, composites, heart valves, collagen, scaffolds, pigments and lipids, among other industrially important biomaterials. Feathers and eggshell waste from the poultry industry can be used for producing keratinous proteins and biocomposites, respectively. Cattle dung, hoofs and cattle hide can be used for producing hydroxyapatite for developing scaffolds and drug delivery systems. Porcine derived collagen can be used for developing skin grafts, while porcine urinary bladder has antiangiogenic, neurotrophic, tumor-suppressive and wound healing properties. Sheep teeth can be used for the production of low-cost hydroxyapatite while goat tissue is still underutilized and requires more in-depth investigation. However, hydrolyzed tannery fleshings show promising potential for antioxidant rich animal feed production. In this review, the recent developments in the production and application of biomaterials from animal waste have been critically analyzed. Standardized protocols for biomaterial synthesis on a pilot scale, and government policy framework for establishing an animal waste supply chain for end users seem to be lacking and require urgent attention. Moreover, circular bioeconomy concepts for animal derived biomaterial production need to be developed for creating a sustainable system.

Indexed as

AbattoirsBiocompatible MaterialsIndustrial WasteAgricultureAnimalsBiotechnologyLivestockPoultryRefuse DisposalBiocompatible MaterialsIndustrial WasteCattle wastegoat wastepig wastepoultrysheepslaughter house waste

Identifiers

PMID34814795
PMCPMC8806998
OpenAlexW3215561912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.