Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34814748›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

Fitness benefits of dietary restriction.

Zahida Sultanova, Edward R Ivimey-Cook, Tracey Chapman, Alexei A Maklakov

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Late-life shift in caloric intake affects fly metabolism and longevity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Fitness benefits of dietary restriction.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zahida SultanovaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3224-8812
Edward R Ivimey-CookSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4910-0443
Tracey ChapmanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2401-8120
Alexei A MaklakovSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5809-1203
University of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dietary restriction (DR) improves survival across a wide range of taxa yet remains poorly understood. The key unresolved question is whether this evolutionarily conserved response to temporary lack of food is adaptive. Recent work suggests that early-life DR reduces survival and reproduction when nutrients subsequently become plentiful, thereby challenging adaptive explanations. A new hypothesis maintains that increased survival under DR results from reduced costs of overfeeding. We tested the adaptive value of DR response in an outbred population of

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionLongevityAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFemaleFertilityReproductionageingdietary restrictionlifespan extensionsenescence

Identifiers

PMID34814748
PMCPMC8611328
OpenAlexW3216455140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.