Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34814675›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2022

Exploring Politics and Contestation in the Policy Process: The Case of Zambia's Contested Community Health Strategy.

Joseph M Zulu, Maligzani P Chavula, Adam Silumbwe, Margarate N Munakampe, Chama Mulubwa, Wanga Zulu, Charles Michelo, Helen Schneider, Uta Lehmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joseph M ZuluDepartment of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0003-1480-4977
Maligzani P ChavulaDepartment of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0003-1189-7194
Adam SilumbweDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0002-1905-5293
Margarate N MunakampeDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0001-9279-241X
Chama MulubwaDepartment of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0002-7907-2167
Wanga ZuluThe Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Charles MicheloDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0002-1697-8519
Helen SchneiderSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0418-1828
Uta LehmannSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2627-8954

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been increased calls for low- and middle-income countries to develop community health systems (CHS) policies or strategies. However, emerging global guidance brackets the inherent complexity and contestation of policy development at the country level. This is explored through the case of Zambia's 5-year Community Health Strategy (CH Strategy), formulated in 2017 and then summarily withdrawn and reissued two years later, with largely similar content. This paper examines the events, actors, and contexts behind this abrupt change in the Strategy, through an analysis of documentary sources and interviews with 21 stakeholders involved in the policy process. We describe an environment of contestation, characterised by numerous international partners weighing in on the CH Strategy, interfacing with shifting loci of responsibility for the CHS in the Ministry of Health (MoH). Despite the rhetoric of participation, providers and communities played no part in the policy process. These dynamics created the conditions for the abrupt change in strategy, illustrating the inherently fraught and political nature of policy development on the CHS in many countries. Going forward, we conclude that paying attention to processes of CHS policy development, and in particular the interaction between events, actors, and contexts, is as important as ensuring meaningful policy content.

Indexed as

Health PolicyPublic HealthHumansPolicy MakingPoliticsZambiaCommunity Health StrategyCommunity Health SystemPolicy DevelopmentPolitics

Identifiers

PMID34814675
PMCPMC9278392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.