Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34814662›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2022

The COVID-19 System Shock Framework: Capturing Health System Innovation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Michael Hodgins, Dee van Leeuwen, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Johanna Hanefeld, Ingrid Wolfe, Christine Lau, Emma Dickins, Joeanne McSweeney, Mary McCaskill, Raghu Lingam

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael HodginsUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9177-3428
Dee van LeeuwenSydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jeffrey BraithwaiteAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0296-4957
Johanna HanefeldDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ingrid WolfeInstitute for Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4717-7634
Christine LauIntegrated Care Project, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Emma DickinsIntegrated Care Project, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Joeanne McSweeneyIntegrated Care Project, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mary McCaskillIntegrated Care Project, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Raghu LingamUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S013601/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in over 2 million deaths globally. The experience in Australia presents an opportunity to study contrasting responses to the COVID-19 health system shock. We adapted the Hanefeld et al framework for health systems shocks to create the COVID-19 System Shock Framework (CSSF). This framework enabled us to assess innovations and changes created through COVID-19 at the Sydney Children's Hospitals Network (SCHN), the largest provider of children's health services in the Southern hemisphere.

methodsWe used ethnographic methods, guided by the CSSF, to map innovations and initiatives implemented across SCHN during the pandemic. An embedded field researcher shadowed members of the emergency operations centre (EOC) for nine months. We also reviewed clinic and policy documents pertinent to SCHN's response to COVID-19 and conducted interviews and focus groups with stakeholders, including clinical directors, project managers, frontline clinicians, and other personnel involved in implementing innovations across SCHN.

resultsThe CSSF captured SCHN's complex response to the pandemic. Responses included a COVID-19 assessment clinic, inpatient and infectious disease management services, redeploying and managing a workforce working from home, cohesive communication initiatives, and remote delivery of care, all enabled by a dedicated COVID-19 fund. The health system values that shaped SCHN's response to the pandemic included principles of equity of healthcare delivery, holistic and integrated models of care, and supporting workforce wellbeing. SCHN's resilience was enabled by innovation fostered through a non-hierarchical governance structure and responsiveness to emerging challenges balanced with a singular vision.

conclusionUsing the CSSF, we found that SCHN's ability to innovate was key to ensuring its resilience during the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19ChildDelivery of Health CareHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2WorkforceCOVID-19EthnographyHealth ManagementHealth System ChangeHealth System Shock

Identifiers

PMID34814662
PMCPMC9808299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.