Observational studyThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2022
Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester of pregnancy: A prospective comparative study.
Observational study in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neonatal outcomes among pregnant women with COVID-19: a systematic scoping review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy-A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Pooled it
- COVID-19 in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk and prevalence of pregnancy loss.Human reproduction update · 2024Pooled it
- Preeclampsia and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection: a systematic review.Journal of hypertension · 2022Pooled it
- Mathematical Modeling of Obstetric Variables: Influence of COVID-19, Periodontal Disease and Dental Care During Pregnancy.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Growth in the first two years in children born to mothers infected with COVID-19 during pregnancy: a cohort study.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- The impact of acute and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women: a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- SARS-CoV-2 infection, inflammation and birth outcomes in a prospective NYC pregnancy cohort.Journal of reproductive immunology · 2024Article
- Neonatal immune cells have heightened responses following in-utero exposure to chorioamnionitis or COVID-19.Pediatric research · 2024Article
- Psychiatric disorders during pregnancy in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive women: Prevalence and effect on outcome.Psychiatry research · 2023Article
- Prenatal diagnosis of VACTERL association after early-first trimester SARS-COV-2 infection.Congenital anomalies · 2023Article
- SARS-CoV-2 Transplacental Transmission: A Rare Occurrence? An Overview of the Protective Role of the Placenta.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Neuroimaging assessment of pediatric cerebral changes associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- The COVID-19 Pandemic and Pregnancy: Impact on Mothers and Newborns.Seminars in pediatric neurology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S): This prospective observational cohort study aimed to evaluate whether women with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during the first trimester of pregnancy are at higher risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared to negative patients. STUDY
designSeromolecular testing for SARS-CoV-2 was performed at 12, 16, 21 weeks, and at delivery; the cohort was then subdivided into a first-trimester SARS-CoV-2-positive (case) group and a SARS-CoV-2-negative (control) group. The primary outcome was a composite adverse obstetric outcome, defined as the presence of either abortion, preterm delivery, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, stillbirth; and a composite measure of adverse neonatal events, including either 1- and 5-min Apgar score ≤ 7, neonatal intensive care unit admission and congenital birth defects. Maternal symptoms and antibody titer were secondarily assessed.
resultsA total of 17 of 164 women tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (10.3%) in the first trimester. One SARS-CoV-2-positive patient who gave birth at another hospital was excluded. Composite adverse obstetric outcome was observed in 6.2% (1/16) SARS-CoV-2-positive and 10.5% (11/105) SARS-CoV-2-negative women; composite adverse neonatal outcome in 12.5% (2/16) and 7.6% (8/105), respectively. In the newborns of women who had developed IgG antibodies, the same antibodies were detected in arterial cord blood and the nasopharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. No maternal pneumonia or hospital admission due to coronavirus disease-19 were recorded.
conclusionAsymptomatic or mildly symptomatic women during the first trimester of pregnancy did not experience significantly more adverse events than SARS-CoV-2-negative women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.