Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34814094›Full record

ArticleEpidemics2021

Optimizing COVID-19 control with asymptomatic surveillance testing in a university environment.

Cara E Brook, Graham R Northrup, Alexander J Ehrenberg, IGI SARS-CoV-2 Testing Consortium, Jennifer A Doudna, Mike Boots

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modeling the Transmission Mitigation Impact of Testing for Infectious Diseases.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Examining SARS-CoV-2 Interventions in Residential Colleges Using an Empirical Network.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Cara E BrookDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, United States; Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, United States. Electronic address: cbrook@uchicago.edu.
Graham R NorthrupCenter for Computational Biology, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, United States.
Alexander J EhrenbergDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, United States; Innovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, United States; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, United States; Memory and Aging Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
IGI SARS-CoV-2 Testing ConsortiumInnovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, United States.
Jennifer A DoudnaInnovative Genomics Institute, University of California, Berkeley, United States; Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, United States; College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, United States; J. David Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, CA, United States; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, United States; California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA; MBIB Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA; Gladstone-UCSF Institute of Genomic Immunology, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mike BootsDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, United States; Department of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity Memory and Aging Center · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

GENOMICST32HG000047 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI RASMUS NIELSEN, Daniel Soleyman Rokhsar · 2000 to 2026
$13.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high proportion of transmission events derived from asymptomatic or presymptomatic infections make SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent in COVID-19, difficult to control through the traditional non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) of symptom-based isolation and contact tracing. As a consequence, many US universities developed asymptomatic surveillance testing labs, to augment NPIs and control outbreaks on campus throughout the 2020-2021 academic year (AY); several of those labs continue to support asymptomatic surveillance efforts on campus in AY2021-2022. At the height of the pandemic, we built a stochastic branching process model of COVID-19 dynamics at UC Berkeley to advise optimal control strategies in a university environment. Our model combines behavioral interventions in the form of group size limits to deter superspreading, symptom-based isolation, and contact tracing, with asymptomatic surveillance testing. We found that behavioral interventions offer a cost-effective means of epidemic control: group size limits of six or fewer greatly reduce superspreading, and rapid isolation of symptomatic infections can halt rising epidemics, depending on the frequency of asymptomatic transmission in the population. Surveillance testing can overcome uncertainty surrounding asymptomatic infections, with the most effective approaches prioritizing frequent testing with rapid turnaround time to isolation over test sensitivity. Importantly, contact tracing amplifies population-level impacts of all infection isolations, making even delayed interventions effective. Combination of behavior-based NPIs and asymptomatic surveillance also reduces variation in daily case counts to produce more predictable epidemics. Furthermore, targeted, intensive testing of a minority of high transmission risk individuals can effectively control the COVID-19 epidemic for the surrounding population. Even in some highly vaccinated university settings in AY2021-2022, asymptomatic surveillance testing offers an effective means of identifying breakthrough infections, halting onward transmission, and reducing total caseload. We offer this blueprint and easy-to-implement modeling tool to other academic or professional communities navigating optimal return-to-work strategies.

Indexed as

COVID-19UniversitiesAsymptomatic InfectionsContact TracingHumansSARS-CoV-2Asymptomatic surveillance testingBranching process modelCOVID-19University control

Identifiers

PMID34814094
PMCPMC8591900
OpenAlexW3211869581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.