Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34813719›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2022

Dismissing "Don't Know" Responses to Perceived Risk Survey Items Threatens the Validity of Theoretical and Empirical Behavior-Change Research.

Erika A Waters, Marc T Kiviniemi, Jennifer L Hay, Heather Orom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erika A WatersDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis.ORCID 0000-0001-7402-0133
Marc T KiviniemiDepartment of Health, Behavior & Society, University of Kentucky.
Jennifer L HayDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Heather OromDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Psychosocial Palliative & Community Research in CancerT32CA009461 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI JENNIFER L HAY, Jamie S. Ostroff · 1985 to 2026
$10.1M
"Don't Know" Responses to Risk Perception Questions: Identifying Mechanisms and SolutionsR01CA197351 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI HAY, JENNIFER L, OROM, HEATHER · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
COMMUNICATING MULTIPLE DISEASE RISKS: A TRANSLATION OF RISK PREDICTION SCIENCER01CA190391 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WATERS, ERIKA A · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
DONT KNOW RESPONSES TO PERCEIVED RISK ITEMS: IMPLICATION FOR HEALTH BEHAVIORR03CA177775 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WATERS, ERIKA A · 2014 to 2015
$186k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190391NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197351NCI NIH HHS R03 CA177775NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the middle of the 20th century, perceptions of risk have been critical to understanding engagement in volitional behavior change. However, theoretical and empirical risk perception research seldom considers the possibility that risk perceptions do not simply exist: They must be formed. Thus, some people may not have formulated a perception of risk for a hazard at the time a researcher asks them, or they may not be confident in the extent to which their perception matches reality. We describe a decade-long research program that investigates the possibility that some people may genuinely not know their risk of even well-publicized hazards. We demonstrate that indications of not knowing (i.e., "don't know" responses) are prevalent in the U.S. population, are systematically more likely to occur among marginalized sociodemographic groups, and are associated with less engagement in protective health behaviors. "Don't know" responses are likely indications of genuinely limited knowledge and therefore may indicate populations in need of targeted intervention. This body of research suggests that not allowing participants to indicate their uncertainty may threaten the validity and generalizability of behavior-change research. We provide concrete recommendations for scientists to allow participants to express uncertainty and to analyze the resulting data.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUncertaintyjudgmentquantitative methodologyreasoningrisk perceptionsocial cognitionsocioeconomic statusthinking

Identifiers

PMID34813719
PMCPMC9081103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.