Trial reportEpilepsia2022
Long-term individual retention with cenobamate in adults with focal seizures: Pooled data from the clinical development program.
Trial report in Epilepsia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Onset of efficacy and adverse events during Cenobamate titration period.Acta neurologica Scandinavica · 2022Trial
- Long-term individual retention with cenobamate in adults with focal seizures: Pooled data from the clinical development program.Epilepsia · 2022Trial
- Positioning Cenobamate in the Treatment Algorithm of Focal Epilepsy: Seizure Control and Benefits Beyond Seizures.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Exploring the Role of Early Add-On Cenobamate in Uncontrolled Focal Epilepsy: A Critical Appraisal of the Evidence.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Narrative Review: Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Newer Third-Generation Antiseizure Medications for Focal Epilepsy: A New Benchmark in Treatment Outcomes?Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Impact of cenobamate on cortical responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation in people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Cenobamate: An Appraisal Five Years On.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Real-world use of Cenobamate in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy: A European multicenter retrospective study.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Cenobamate in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy: real-world evidence from a two-center retrospective study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Observational
- Epilepsy: Molecular Pathogenesis and Emerging Therapies.MedComm · 2026Review
- Observational
- Long-term Impact of Cenobamate on Cognition in Patients with Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy: Outcomes from an Exploratory Real-World Study.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- A french real-world experience with cenobamate in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy: A retrospective observational study.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2025Article
- Early Introduction of Cenobamate in Uncontrolled Focal Epilepsy: Insights from a Structured Controversy.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Cenobamate: A Review in Focal-Onset Seizures.CNS drugs · 2025Review
- The Effectiveness of Cenobamate in Patients Treated With Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Drug Resistant Epilepsy.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Cenobamate, a New Promising Antiseizure Medication: Experimental and Clinical Aspects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Cenobamate as an Early Adjunctive Treatment in Drug-Resistant Focal-Onset Seizures: An Observational Cohort Study.CNS drugs · 2024Observational
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe determined retention on open-label cenobamate therapy in the clinical development program to assess the long-term efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate in individuals with uncontrolled focal seizures.
methodsData from two randomized, controlled cenobamate studies and one open-label safety and pharmacokinetic study were pooled. Based on the percentage of participants remaining on treatment, retention rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. We performed two additional analyses to assess factors contributing to retention, stratifying a robust data set (through 2 years) by cenobamate modal dose and frequently used concomitant anti-seizure medications. Cenobamate discontinuations and treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized.
resultsData from 1844 participants were pooled: 149 from a single-dose randomized trial, 355 from a multi-dose randomized trial, and 1340 from an open-label safety and pharmacokinetic study. Most participants from randomized trials continued in open-label extensions, and pooled data represent >95% of participants exposed to cenobamate. Baseline characteristics and disease and treatment histories were similar across studies. Median duration of cenobamate exposure was 34 months, with a median modal dose of 200 mg/day. Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative cenobamate retention rates were 80% at 1 year and 72% at 2 years. Once participants reached the maintenance phase, retention rates were consistently high in participants receiving ≥100 mg/day cenobamate, and concomitant anti-seizure medications did not affect long-term retention. By 2 years, 535 (29%) had actually discontinued cenobamate; the most common reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (37.6%), withdrawal of consent (21.1%), and other (16.8%). SIGNIFICANCE: Treatment retention rates provide a proxy measure for long-term efficacy, safety, tolerability, and adherence. The consistently high retention rates we found suggest that cenobamate may be an effective and well-tolerated new treatment option for people with drug-resistant focal seizures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.