Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34813673›Full record

Trial reportEpilepsia2022

Long-term individual retention with cenobamate in adults with focal seizures: Pooled data from the clinical development program.

Josemir W Sander, William E Rosenfeld, Jonathan J Halford, Bernhard J Steinhoff, Victor Biton, Manuel Toledo

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Epilepsia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cenobamate: An Appraisal Five Years On.Neurology and therapy · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Josemir W SanderNIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6041-9661
William E RosenfeldComprehensive Epilepsy Care Center for Children and Adults, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9504-3980
Jonathan J HalfordComprehensive Epilepsy Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1681-6744
Bernhard J SteinhoffDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Kork Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5995-5862
Victor BitonArkansas Epilepsy Program, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Manuel ToledoEpilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Arkansas Cardiology · USCenter for Children · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUCL Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe determined retention on open-label cenobamate therapy in the clinical development program to assess the long-term efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate in individuals with uncontrolled focal seizures.

methodsData from two randomized, controlled cenobamate studies and one open-label safety and pharmacokinetic study were pooled. Based on the percentage of participants remaining on treatment, retention rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. We performed two additional analyses to assess factors contributing to retention, stratifying a robust data set (through 2 years) by cenobamate modal dose and frequently used concomitant anti-seizure medications. Cenobamate discontinuations and treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized.

resultsData from 1844 participants were pooled: 149 from a single-dose randomized trial, 355 from a multi-dose randomized trial, and 1340 from an open-label safety and pharmacokinetic study. Most participants from randomized trials continued in open-label extensions, and pooled data represent >95% of participants exposed to cenobamate. Baseline characteristics and disease and treatment histories were similar across studies. Median duration of cenobamate exposure was 34 months, with a median modal dose of 200 mg/day. Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative cenobamate retention rates were 80% at 1 year and 72% at 2 years. Once participants reached the maintenance phase, retention rates were consistently high in participants receiving ≥100 mg/day cenobamate, and concomitant anti-seizure medications did not affect long-term retention. By 2 years, 535 (29%) had actually discontinued cenobamate; the most common reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (37.6%), withdrawal of consent (21.1%), and other (16.8%). SIGNIFICANCE: Treatment retention rates provide a proxy measure for long-term efficacy, safety, tolerability, and adherence. The consistently high retention rates we found suggest that cenobamate may be an effective and well-tolerated new treatment option for people with drug-resistant focal seizures.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsSeizuresAdultCarbamatesChlorophenolsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansTetrazolesTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsCarbamatesCenobamateChlorophenolsTetrazolesefficacyepilepsyopen-labelretention ratetolerability

Identifiers

PMID34813673
PMCPMC9299487
OpenAlexW3216724966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.