ArticlePloS one2021
Development of a self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia using co-production and behaviour change theory: An outline of methods and processes.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond the Meeting: Patient and Public Involvement Practices and Barriers to Inclusive Participation in Stroke Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Co-Producing the Design Brief for an Intervention to Increase Breast Cancer Awareness Among Black Women in Ante-Natal Settings: A Qualitative Study With Breast Cancer Survivors, Community Members, and Midwives in the UK.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Stroke Action Plan for Europe 2018-2030 (SAP-E): mid-term review and update.European stroke journal · 2026Review
- The involvement of individuals with speech and language impairments in research: insights from a co-creation process.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Co-Designing Aphasia Services: Evaluation of Involvement and Processes to Support Inclusion of People With Post Stroke Aphasia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Co-Development of the CoMUni Intervention: A Social-Media-Based Resource to Increase Mental Health Help-Seeking Behaviours in UK Undergraduates.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- A scoping review and thematic analysis on coping strategies used by people with aphasia.Aphasiology · 2025Article
- Co-producing an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 75 informed by behaviour change theory.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Protocol for a feasibility study evaluating a supported self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia (StarStep study).Pilot and feasibility studies · 2025Article
- Using the Behaviour Change Wheel to develop an intervention to improve conversations about recovery on the stroke unit.PloS one · 2025Article
- Motivation as a Predictor of Aphasia Treatment Outcomes: A Scoping Review.Topics in language disorders · 2022Article
- Tailoring and Evaluating an Intervention to Support Self-management After Stroke: Protocol for a Multi-case, Mixed Methods Comparison Study.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelf-management is a promising approach to improve quality of life after stroke. However, evidence for the appropriateness and effectiveness of self-management for stroke survivors with aphasia is limited. This article reports on the process used to develop a supported self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia (SSWA) using co-production and behaviour change theory. Preparatory research included systematic reviews, and qualitative interviews and focus groups with SSWA, family members and speech and language therapists (SLTs). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted six, 2 hour long intervention development workshops with key stakeholders. The workshops were informed by principles of co-production and the intervention development process outlined by the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). We also incorporated the findings of our preparatory research within workshops. Each workshop included an introduction, 1-2 co-production tasks and time for feedback at the end of the session. Data were analysed on an ongoing basis so that findings could be used to feed in to subsequent workshops and intervention development.
resultsWorkshop participants (n = 12) included; SSWA (n = 5), family members (n = 3) and SLTs (n = 4). Together, participants engaged with accessible and participatory co-production tasks which aligned with the BCW framework. Participants engaged in discussion to define self-management in behavioural terms (behavioural diagnosis) and to identify what needed to change to support self-management. Participant's co-produced solutions for supporting self-management and discussed options to implement these in practice. Prototype materials were generated by the research team and evaluated by participants. Intervention functions and behaviour change techniques (BCTs) were mapped to the solutions generated by participants by the research team, after the final workshop. A supported self-management intervention for SSWA was developed which will be delivered by SLTs through community stroke services.
conclusionsThis paper reports the process we used to integrate co-production work with behaviour change theory to develop a complex self-management intervention. This is of relevance for researchers looking to harness the strengths of co-production methods and theory in intervention design. Future research will feasibility test the supported self-management intervention developed. This paper provides transparency to our intervention development process which will help others to better interpret the findings of our feasibility work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.