Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34813598›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Low risk of relapse and deformity among leprosy patients who completed multi-drug therapy regimen from 2005 to 2010: A cohort study from four districts in South India.

Prabu Rajkumar, Girish Kumar Chethrapilly Purushothaman, Manickam Ponnaiah, Devika Shanmugasundaram, Jayasree Padma, Rang Lal Meena, Selvaraj Vadivoo, Sanjay M Mehendale

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Leprosy prevalence spatial distribution and trend in a health region in Northeast Brazil, 2008-2017: an ecological study.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prabu RajkumarDivision of Health Systems Research, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9839-800X
Girish Kumar Chethrapilly PurushothamanLaboratory Division, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5464-1028
Manickam PonnaiahDivision of Online Courses, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0797-0822
Devika ShanmugasundaramDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.
Jayasree PadmaDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.
Rang Lal MeenaLaboratory Division, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.
Selvaraj VadivooDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.
Sanjay M MehendaleDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, ICMR-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2191-4034
National Institute of Epidemiology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRelapse of leprosy among patients released from treatment (RFT) is an indicator of the success of anti-leprosy treatment. Due to inadequate follow-up, relapse in leprosy patients after RFT is not systematically documented in India. Relapsed leprosy patients pose a risk in the transmission of leprosy bacilli. We determined the incidence of relapse and deformity among the patients RFT from the leprosy control programme in four districts in South India.

methodsWe conducted two follow-up surveys in 2012 and 2014 among the leprosy patients RFT between 2005 and 2010. We assessed them for any symptoms or signs of relapse, persistence and deformity. We collected slit skin samples (SSS) for smear examination. We calculated overall incidence of relapse and deformity per 1000 person-years (PY) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and cumulative risk of relapse.

resultsOverall, we identified 69 relapse events, 58 and 11, during the first and second follow-up surveys, respectively. The incidence of relapse was 5.42 per 1000 PY, which declined over the years after RFT. The cumulative risk of relapse was 2.24%. The rate of deformity among the relapsed patients was 30.9%. The overall incidence of deformity was 1.65 per 1000 person years. The duration of M. leprae detection in smears ranged between 2.38 and 7.67 years.

conclusionsLow relapse and deformity rates in leprosy RFT patients are indicative of treatment effectiveness. However, a higher proportion of detection of deformity among relapsed cases is a cause for concern. Periodic follow-up of RFT patients for up to 3 years to detect relapses early and ensure appropriate treatment will minimize the development of deformity among relapsed patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntitubercular AgentsChildCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIndiaLeprosyMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesRecurrenceYoung AdultAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID34813598
PMCPMC8610257
OpenAlexW3216943989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.