Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34813596›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Detection of cross-reactive immunoglobulin A against the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 spike 1 subunit in saliva.

Keiichi Tsukinoki, Tatsuo Yamamoto, Keisuke Handa, Mariko Iwamiya, Juri Saruta, Satoshi Ino, Takashi Sakurai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. SIgA in various pulmonary diseases.European journal of medical research · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Oral Pathology in COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 Infection-Molecular Aspects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keiichi TsukinokiDepartment of Environmental Pathology, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tatsuo YamamotoDepartment of Dental Sociology, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.
Keisuke HandaDepartment of Oral Biochemistry, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.
Mariko IwamiyaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kanagawa Dental University Hospital, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.
Juri SarutaDepartment of Environmental Pathology, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.
Satoshi InoDepartment of Minimal Intervention Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takashi SakuraiDepartment of Maxillofacial Radiology, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kanagawa Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abundant secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) in the mucus, breast milk, and saliva provides immunity against infection of mucosal surfaces. Pre-pandemic breast milk samples containing SIgA have been reported to cross-react with SARS-CoV-2; however, it remains unknown whether SIgA showing the cross-reaction with SARS-CoV-2 exists in saliva. We aimed to clarify whether SIgA in saliva cross-reacts with SARS-CoV-2 spike 1 subunit in individuals who have not been infected with this virus. The study involved 137 (men, n = 101; women, n = 36; mean age, 38.7; age range, 24-65 years) dentists and doctors from Kanagawa Dental University Hospital. Saliva and blood samples were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunochromatography for IgG and IgM, respectively. We then identified patients with saliva samples that were confirmed to be PCR-negative and IgM-negative for SARS-CoV-2. The cross-reactivity of IgA-positive saliva samples with SARS-CoV-2 was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using a biotin-labeled spike recombinant protein (S1-mFc) covering the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2. The proportion of SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive IgA-positive individuals was 46.7%, which correlated negatively with age (r = -0.218, p = 0.01). The proportion of IgA-positive individuals aged ≥50 years was significantly lower than that of patients aged ≤49 years (p = 0.008). SIgA was purified from the saliva of patients, which could partially suppress the binding of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to the angiotensin converting enzyme-2 receptor. This study demonstrates the presence of SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive SIgA in the saliva of individuals who had never been infected with the virus, suggesting that SIgA may help prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Indexed as

AdultCOVID-19Cross ReactionsFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin AMaleMiddle AgedProtein SubunitsSalivaSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusYoung AdultImmunoglobulin AProtein SubunitsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34813596
PMCPMC8610234
OpenAlexW3216264997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.