Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34813150›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution2022

The mammalian brain under domestication: Discovering patterns after a century of old and new analyses.

A M Balcarcel, M Geiger, M Clauss, M R Sánchez-Villagra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Australasian dingo archetype:bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  19. The mammalian brain under domestication: Discovering patterns after a century of old and new analyses.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2022
    Review
  20. Cranial shape variation in domestication: A pilot study on the case of rabbits.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A M BalcarcelPalaeontological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
M GeigerPalaeontological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
M ClaussVetsuisse Faculty, Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
M R Sánchez-VillagraPalaeontological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparisons of wild and domestic populations have established brain reduction as one of the most consistent patterns correlated with domestication. Over a century of scholarly work has been devoted to this subject, and yet, new data continue to foster its debate. Current arguments, both for and against the validity of brain reduction occurring in domestic taxa, have repeatedly cited a small set of reviews on this subject. The original works, their sampling, methodological details, and nuances of results that would be key to establishing validity, particularly in light of new data, have not been investigated. To facilitate and encourage a more informed discussion, we present a comprehensive review of original brain reduction literature for four mammalian clades: Artiodactyla, Perissodactyla, Carnivora, and Glires. Among these are studies that generated the most cited brain reduction values in modern domestication literature. In doing so, we provide a fairer stage for the critique of traits associated with domestication. We conclude that while brain reduction magnitudes may contain error, empirical data collectively support the reduction in brain size and cranial capacity for domestic forms.

Indexed as

CarnivoraDomesticationAnimalsBrainPhenotypeSkullallometryArtiodactylaencephalizationskull

Identifiers

PMID34813150
PMCPMC9787656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.