Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34813062›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Resurrecting Enzymes by Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction.

Maria Laura Mascotti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Highly efficient production ofSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Topiary: Pruning the manual labor from ancestral sequence reconstruction.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Laura MascottiMolecular Enzymology group, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.l.mascotti@rug.nl.
University of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction (ASR) allows one to infer the sequences of extinct proteins using the phylogeny of extant proteins. It consists of disclosing the evolutionary history-i.e., the phylogeny-of a protein family of interest and then inferring the sequences of its ancestors-i.e., the nodes in the phylogeny. Assisted by gene synthesis, the selected ancestors can be resurrected in the lab and experimentally characterized. The crucial step to succeed with ASR is starting from a reliable phylogeny. At the same time, it is of the utmost importance to have a clear idea on the evolutionary history of the family under study and the events that influenced it. This allows us to implement ASR with well-defined hypotheses and to apply the appropriate experimental methods. In the last years, ASR has become popular to test hypotheses about the origin of functionalities, changes in activities, understanding physicochemical properties of proteins, among others. In this context, the aim of this chapter is to present the ASR approach applied to the reconstruction of enzymes-i.e., proteins with catalytic roles. The spirit of this contribution is to provide a basic, hands-to-work guide for biochemists and biologists who are unfamiliar with molecular phylogenetics.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic TechniquesPhylogenyProteinsSequence AnalysisProteinsAncestral sequence reconstructionEnzyme functionEvolutionary biochemistryMolecular evolutionPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID34813062
OpenAlexW3217175664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.