ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022
Environmental impacts of FDI: evidence from heterogeneous panel methods.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants that attract and discourage foreign direct investment in GCC countries: Do macroeconomic and environmental factors matter?PloS one · 2024Article
- Roadmap for carbon neutrality: the mediating role of clean energy development-related investments.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper investigates the effect of foreign direct investment (FDI) on environmental quality for 123 nations over the period 1996 to 2018. The study also conducts a comparative analysis for 45 developing and 78 developed nations to better understand the environmental impacts of foreign direct investment. The study employs pooled mean group (PMG) and mean group (MG) estimation techniques for investigating the impacts of FDI on environmental quality as the slope heterogeneity test rejects the null hypothesis of homogenous slope coefficients for the cross-sectional units in all country groupings. In addition, the study employs common correlated effect pooled mean group (CCEPMG) and common correlated effect mean group (CCEMG) estimation methods to tackle cross-sectional dependence in all country groupings. The results indicate that the impact of FDI on environmental emission is negative and significant for the global sample. Furthermore, the comparative analysis for developed and developing countries indicates that FDI improves environmental quality in developed nations as it leads to a lower level of CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
34813013What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.