Observational studyIndian journal of pediatrics2022
Clinical Profile and Outcome of Children Requiring Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV).
Observational study in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the clinical profile and outcome of children requiring noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in a PICU.
methodsThis prospective observational study was conducted in the PICU at Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Punjab. Children (1 mo-18 y) with moderate-to-severe respiratory distress who received NIV during one-year period were included. Failure was defined as the need for endotracheal intubation. The patients received bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) with inspiratory and expiratory positive airway pressure (8-18 cm H
resultsOut of total 115 patients, 81.7% were successfully treated by NIV whereas 18.3% constituted NIV failure group. Two types of NIV were used, 65.2% were started on BiPAP and 34.8% on indigenous bubble CPAP. Most common diagnosis was tropical fever (24.3%), bronchopneumonia (20%), and sepsis with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) (7.8%). Commonest indication of NIV was respiratory distress (70.4%) and prevention of postextubation respiratory failure (20.8%). Seven patients (6.9%) died during the study. NIV failure is higher in children with sepsis with MODS, abnormal blood gas (acidosis), and moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that NIV is an effective form of respiratory support for children with acute respiratory distress/failure. Sepsis with MODS, acidosis and ARDS (moderate to severe) were predictors of NIV failure. Careful patient selection may help in judicious use of NIV in PICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.