Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34812838›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2021

Metamer mismatching underlies color difference sensitivity.

Brian V Funt, Emitis Roshan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The object-color solid.Journal of vision · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian V FuntSchool of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Emitis RoshanSchool of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Color difference sensitivity as represented by the size of discrimination ellipsoids is known to depend on where the colors reside within color space. In the past, various color spaces and color difference formulas have been developed as parametric fits to the experimental data with the goal of establishing a color coordinate system in which equally discriminable colors are equal distances apart. These empirical models, however, provide no explanation as to why color discrimination varies in the way it does. This article considers the hypothesis that the variation in color discrimination tolerances reflects the uncertainty created by the degree of metamer mismatching for a given color. Specifically, the greater the degree of metamer mismatching for a color, the wider the range of spectral reflectances that could have led to it and, hence, the more finely a color needs to be discriminated in order to reliably identify materials and objects. To test this hypothesis, the available color discrimination data sets for surface colors are gathered and analyzed. A strong correlation between color discrimination and the degree of metamer mismatching is found. This correlation provides evidence that metamer mismatching provides an explanation as to why color discrimination varies throughout color space as it does.

Indexed as

Color PerceptionColorHumansUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID34812838
PMCPMC8626845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.