ArticleJournal of vision2021
Metamer mismatching underlies color difference sensitivity.
Article in Journal of vision, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Effect of Saudi Coffee Consumption in Comparison to Various Types of Coffees on the Color of Novel Aesthetic Dental Ceramics.The Saudi dental journal · 2025Article
- The object-color solid.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Influences of luting cement shade on the color of various translucent monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics for veneer restorations.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Color difference sensitivity as represented by the size of discrimination ellipsoids is known to depend on where the colors reside within color space. In the past, various color spaces and color difference formulas have been developed as parametric fits to the experimental data with the goal of establishing a color coordinate system in which equally discriminable colors are equal distances apart. These empirical models, however, provide no explanation as to why color discrimination varies in the way it does. This article considers the hypothesis that the variation in color discrimination tolerances reflects the uncertainty created by the degree of metamer mismatching for a given color. Specifically, the greater the degree of metamer mismatching for a color, the wider the range of spectral reflectances that could have led to it and, hence, the more finely a color needs to be discriminated in order to reliably identify materials and objects. To test this hypothesis, the available color discrimination data sets for surface colors are gathered and analyzed. A strong correlation between color discrimination and the degree of metamer mismatching is found. This correlation provides evidence that metamer mismatching provides an explanation as to why color discrimination varies throughout color space as it does.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.