Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34812749›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2022

Advanced neuroimaging techniques in epilepsy.

John S Duncan, Karin Trimmel

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

John S DuncanDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London.
Karin TrimmelDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London.
Epilepsy Society · GBMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Wellcome Trust 067176Wellcome Trust 218380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe review significant advances in epilepsy imaging in recent years. RECENT

findingsStructural MRI at 7T with optimization of acquisition and postacquisition image processing increases the diagnostic yield but artefactual findings remain a challenge. MRI analysis from multiple sites indicates different atrophy patterns and white matter diffusion abnormalities in temporal lobe and generalized epilepsies, with greater abnormalities close to the presumed seizure source. Structural and functional connectivity relate to seizure spread and generalization; longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the causal relationship of these associations. Diffusion MRI may help predict surgical outcome and network abnormalities extending beyond the epileptogenic zone. Three-dimensional multimodal imaging can increase the precision of epilepsy surgery, improve seizure outcome and reduce complications. Language and memory fMRI are useful predictors of postoperative deficits, and lead to risk minimization. FDG PET is useful for clinical studies and specific ligands probe the pathophysiology of neurochemical fluxes and receptor abnormalities. SUMMARY: Improved structural MRI increases detection of abnormalities that may underlie epilepsy. Diffusion, structural and functional MRI indicate the widespread associations of epilepsy syndromes. These can assist stratification of surgical outcome and minimize risk. PET has continued utility clinically and for research into the pathophysiology of epilepsies.

Indexed as

EpilepsyEpilepsy, Temporal LobeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingPositron-Emission TomographySeizures

Identifiers

PMID34812749
PMCPMC7618160
OpenAlexW3215221064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.