Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34812729›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2022

Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy is safe and effective in patients with extended selection criteria.

Gregory William Hosier, Kashif Visram, Thomas McGregor, Stephen Steele, Naji J Touma, Darren Beiko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Money talks.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  4. Micro cost-effectiveness analysis of standard vs. mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy A single Canadian institution's experience.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  5. Review of efficacy and safety of same-day discharge after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Performing urological inpatient procedures as same-day procedures during the COVID pandemic A retrospective feasibility study.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
  8. Considerations before changing ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy practices.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gregory William HosierDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Kashif VisramDepartment of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Thomas McGregorDepartment of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Stephen SteeleDepartment of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Naji J ToumaDepartment of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Darren BeikoDepartment of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmbulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been limited to highly selected patients. The objective of our study was to compare complication and stone-free rates after ambulatory PCNL in standard selection criteria vs. extended criteria patients.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of prospective data on all patients who underwent ambulatory PCNL at one academic center from 2007-2018. Extended criteria patients were defined as one or more of: age >75 years, body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m

resultsWe identified 118 patients, of which 92 (78%) met extended criteria. Mean BMI was 31 kg/m

conclusionsComplication and stone-free rates were not different between standard and extended selection criteria patients undergoing ambulatory PCNL. This data indicates that many of the preoperative patient and stone factors that have previously been used as exclusion criteria for ambulatory PCNL are not strictly necessary.

Identifiers

PMID34812729
PMCPMC9054338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.