ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2021
Trends in Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Clostridioides difficile Infection, Hong Kong.
Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in the Epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile Infection.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2025Review
- Clostridioides difficile co-infection worsens prognosis in inflammatory bowel disease in patients with cytomegalovirus colitis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- The Global Burden ofInfectious disease reports · 2025Review
- Molecular characteristics, clonal transmission, and risk factors ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- The Prevalence and Risk Factors ofJournal of Korean medical science · 2023Article
- Comparing the impact of two contact isolation modes for hospitalised patients with Clostridioides difficile infection on the quality of care.Journal of clinical nursing · 2023Article
- Review
- The evaluation of different types fecal bacteria products for the treatment of recurrentFrontiers in surgery · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.