Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34812372›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2020

Quantifying the Time-Lag Effects of Human Mobility on the COVID-19 Transmission: A Multi-City Study in China.

Wang Xi, Tao Pei, Qiyong Liu, Ci Song, Yaxi Liu, Xiao Chen, Jia Ma, Zhixin Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Effectiveness of Mobility Restrictions on Controlling the Spread of COVID-19 in a Resistant Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wang XiState Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100101 China.
Tao PeiState Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100101 China.
Qiyong LiuState Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Disease, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and PreventionChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention Beijing 102206 China.
Ci SongState Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100101 China.
Yaxi LiuState Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100101 China.
Xiao ChenState Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100101 China.
Jia MaDongfang HospitalBeijing University of Chinese Medicine Beijing 100078 China.
Zhixin ZhangChina-Japan Friendship Hospital Beijing 100029 China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNChina-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNNational Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first wave of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemic in China showed there was a lag between the reduction in human mobility and the decline in COVID-19 transmission and this lag was different in cities. A prolonged lag would cause public panic and reflect the inefficiency of control measures. This study aims to quantify this time-lag effect and reveal its influencing socio-demographic and environmental factors, which is helpful to policymaking in controlling COVID-19 and other potential infectious diseases in the future. We combined city-level mobility index and new case time series for 80 most affected cities in China from Jan 17 to Feb 29, 2020. Cross correlation analysis and spatial autoregressive model were used to estimate the lag length and determine influencing factors behind it, respectively. The results show that mobility is strongly correlated with COVID-19 transmission in most cities with lags of 10 days (interquartile range 8 - 11 days) and correlation coefficients of 0.68 ± 0.12. This time-lag is consistent with the incubation period plus time for reporting. Cities with a shorter lag appear to have a shorter epidemic duration. This lag is shorter in cities with larger volume of population flow from Wuhan, higher designated hospitals density and urban road density while economically advantaged cities tend to have longer time lags. These findings suggest that cities with compact urban structure should strictly adhere to human mobility restrictions, while economically prosperous cities should also strengthen other non-pharmaceutical interventions to control the spread of the virus.

Indexed as

control measuresCOVID-19cross correlationhuman mobilityinfluencing factors

Identifiers

PMID34812372
PMCPMC8545259
OpenAlexW3108058577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.