Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34812352›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2020

Weakly-Supervised Network for Detection of COVID-19 in Chest CT Scans.

Ahmed Mohammed, Congcong Wang, Meng Zhao, Mohib Ullah, Rabia Naseem, Hao Wang, Marius Pedersen, Faouzi Alaya Cheikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. COVID-19 in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Review.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. COVID-19 Detection Based on Image Regrouping and Resnet-SVM Using Chest X-Ray Images.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ahmed MohammedDepartment of Computer ScienceNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) 2815 Gjøvik Norway.
Congcong WangDepartment of Computer ScienceNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) 2815 Gjøvik Norway.
Meng ZhaoDepartment of Computer ScienceNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) 2815 Gjøvik Norway.
Mohib UllahDepartment of Computer ScienceNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) 2815 Gjøvik Norway.
Rabia NaseemDepartment of Computer ScienceNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) 2815 Gjøvik Norway.
Hao WangDepartment of Computer ScienceNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) 2815 Gjøvik Norway.
Marius PedersenDepartment of Computer ScienceNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) 2815 Gjøvik Norway.
Faouzi Alaya CheikhDepartment of Computer ScienceNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) 2815 Gjøvik Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep Learning-based chest Computed Tomography (CT) analysis has been proven to be effective and efficient for COVID-19 diagnosis. Existing deep learning approaches heavily rely on large labeled data sets, which are difficult to acquire in this pandemic situation. Therefore, weakly-supervised approaches are in demand. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end weakly-supervised COVID-19 detection approach, ResNext+, that only requires volume level data labels and can provide slice level prediction. The proposed approach incorporates a lung segmentation mask as well as spatial and channel attention to extract spatial features. Besides, Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) is utilized to acquire the axial dependency of the slices. Moreover, a slice attention module is applied before the final fully connected layer to generate the slice level prediction without additional supervision. An ablation study is conducted to show the efficiency of the attention blocks and the segmentation mask block. Experimental results, obtained from publicly available datasets, show a precision of 81.9% and F1 score of 81.4%. The closest state-of-the-art gives 76.7% precision and 78.8% F1 score. The 5% improvement in precision and 3% in the F1 score demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. It is worth noticing that, applying image enhancement approaches do not improve the performance of the proposed method, sometimes even harm the scores, although the enhanced images have better perceptual quality.

Indexed as

Attentioncomputed tomographyCOVID-19deep learningdetectionenhancementLSTMsegmentationweakly-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID34812352
PMCPMC8545309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.