Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34811852›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2022

Development of directed global inhibition, competitive inhibition and behavioural inhibition during the transition between infancy and toddlerhood.

Alexandra Hendry, Isobel Greenhalgh, Rhiannon Bailey, Abigail Fiske, Henrik Dvergsdal, Karla Holmboe

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Children's eating behaviours and related constructs: conceptual and theoretical foundations and their implications.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandra HendryDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1985-2521
Isobel GreenhalghDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Rhiannon BaileySchool of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Abigail FiskeDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Henrik DvergsdalDivision of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Nord University Business School, Bodø, Norway.
Karla HolmboeDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3157-6101
University of Oxford · GBNord University · NOUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

UK Medical Research Council MR/N008626/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibitory control (IC) is a core executive function integral to self-regulation and cognitive control, yet is itself multi-componential. Directed global inhibition entails stopping an action on demand. Competitive inhibition is engaged when an alternative response must also be produced. Related, but not an executive function, is temperamentally-driven wariness of novelty, known as behavioural inhibition. Understanding early development of these components has been hampered by a shortage of suitable measures. We combine established and novel measures to capture directed global inhibition (Toy Prohibition, Touchscreen Prohibition), competitive inhibition (A-not-B, Early Childhood Inhibitory Touchscreen Task; ECITT) and behavioural inhibition (Touchscreen Approach) in 113 10- and 16-month-olds (73 seen longitudinally). ECITT performance shows good 1-week test-retest reliability at 10-months (r = 0.30-0.60) but little stability to 16-months. Directed global inhibition performance shows developmental progression but little stability of individual differences from 10 to 16 months. Performance on measures targeting similar IC components shows greater coherence at 16-months (r = 0.23-0.59) compared with 10-months (r = 0.09-0.35). Probing of ECITT condition effects indicates toddlers are more able, compared with infants, to override immediate prepotencies; indicative of increasingly flexible control over behaviour. However, exerting IC over cumulative prepotencies appears just as challenging for toddlers as infants. Exploratory analyses show little evidence for cross-sectional or longitudinal associations between behavioural, directed global and competitive inhibition. In combination, these findings indicate that IC is not yet a stable, unidimensional construct during the transition between infancy and toddlerhood, and highlight the need for careful selection of multiple measures for those interested in capturing early variation in IC.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionInhibition, PsychologicalChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIndividualityInfantReproducibility of Resultsbehavioral inhibitionexecutive functioninfantinhibitory controlself-regulationtoddler

Identifiers

PMID34811852
PMCPMC11475536
OpenAlexW3143012449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.