Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34811788›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2022

Population pharmacokinetics of clonazepam in saliva and plasma: Steps towards noninvasive pharmacokinetic studies in vulnerable populations.

Matthijs D Kruizinga, Rob G J A Zuiker, Kirsten R Bergmann, Annelies C Egas, Adam F Cohen, Gijs W E Santen, Michiel J van Esdonk

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Clonazepam repurposing inJournal of medical genetics · 2025
    Trial
  4. Prehospital rescue treatment of cluster epileptic seizures and status epilepticus.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matthijs D KruizingaCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2054-2187
Rob G J A ZuikerCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5604-0157
Kirsten R BergmannCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Annelies C EgasDepartment of Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Adam F CohenCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7452-6222
Gijs W E SantenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Michiel J van EsdonkCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8159-0273
Centre for Human Drug Research · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLLeiden University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTraditional studies focusing on the relationship between pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics necessitate blood draws, which are too invasive for children or other vulnerable populations. A potential solution is to use noninvasive sampling matrices, such as saliva. The aim of this study was to develop a population PK model describing the relationship between plasma and saliva clonazepam kinetics and assess whether the model can be used to determine trough plasma concentrations based on saliva samples.

methodsTwenty healthy subjects, aged 18-30, were recruited and administered 0.5 or 1 mg of clonazepam solution. Paired plasma and saliva samples were obtained until 48 hours post-dose. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed describing the PK of clonazepam in plasma and the relationship between plasma and saliva concentrations. Bayesian maximum a posteriori optimization was applied to estimate the predictive accuracy of the model.

resultsA two-compartment distribution model best characterized clonazepam plasma kinetics with a mixture component on the absorption rate constants. Oral administration of the clonazepam solution caused contamination of the saliva compartment during the first 4 hours post-dose, after which the concentrations were driven by the plasma concentrations. Simulations demonstrated that the lower and upper limits of agreements between true and predicted plasma concentrations were -28% to 36% with one saliva sample. Increasing the number of saliva samples improved these limits to -18% to 17%.

conclusionThe developed model described the salivary and plasma kinetics of clonazepam, and could predict steady-state trough plasma concentrations based on saliva concentrations with acceptable accuracy.

Indexed as

ClonazepamSalivaBayes TheoremChildHumansPlasmaVulnerable PopulationsClonazepamclonazepamepilepsynoninvasivenonmempharmacokineticsplasmapopulation modelsaliva

Identifiers

PMID34811788
PMCPMC9299763
OpenAlexW3216438777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.