ArticleStatistics in medicine2022
A conditional autoregressive model for genetic association analysis accounting for genetic heterogeneity.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic risk predictions using deep learning models with summary data.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Genetic Prediction Modeling in Large Cohort Studies via Boosting Targeted Loss Functions.Statistics in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Converging evidence from genetic studies and population genetics theory suggest that complex diseases are characterized by remarkable genetic heterogeneity, and individual rare mutations with different effects could collectively play an important role in human diseases. Many existing statistical models for association analysis assume homogeneous effects of genetic variants across all individuals, and could be subject to power loss in the presence of genetic heterogeneity. To consider possible heterogeneous genetic effects among individuals, we propose a conditional autoregressive model. In the proposed method, the genetic effect is considered as a random effect and a score test is developed to test the variance component of genetic random effect. Through simulations, we compare the type I error and power performance of the proposed method with those of the generalized genetic random field and the sequence kernel association test methods under different disease scenarios. We find that our method outperforms the other two methods when (i) the rare variants have the major contribution to the disease, or (ii) the genetic effects vary in different individuals or subgroups of individuals. Finally, we illustrate the new method by applying it to the whole genome sequencing data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.