Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34811709›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2022

The posterior cerebellum and temporoparietal junction support explicit learning of social belief sequences.

Qianying Ma, Min Pu, Naem P Haihambo, Kris Baetens, Elien Heleven, Natacha Deroost, Chris Baeken, Frank Van Overwalle

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Social and emotional learning in the cerebellum.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Qianying MaDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B -, 1050, Brussels, Belgium. qianying.ma@vub.ac.be.
Min PuDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B -, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Naem P HaihamboDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B -, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Kris BaetensDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B -, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Elien HelevenDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B -, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Natacha DeroostDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B -, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Chris BaekenDepartment of Head and Skin, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent Experimental, Ghent, Belgium.
Frank Van OverwalleDepartment of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B -, 1050, Brussels, Belgium. Frank.VanOverwalle@vub.be.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study tests the hypothesis that the posterior cerebellum is involved in social cognition by identifying and automatizing sequences of social actions. We applied a belief serial reaction time task (Belief SRT task), which requires mentalizing about two protagonists' beliefs about how many flowers they receive. The protagonists' beliefs could either be true or false depending on their orientation (true belief: oriented towards and directly observing the flowers; or false belief: oriented away and knowing only prior information about flowers). A Control SRT task was created by replacing protagonists and their beliefs with shapes and colors. Participants were explicitly told that there was a standard sequence related to the two protagonists' belief orientations (Belief SRT task) or the shapes' colors (Control SRT task). Both tasks included a Training phase where the standard sequence was repeated and a Test phase where this standard sequence was interrupted by random sequences. As hypothesized, compared with the Control SRT task, the Belief SRT task recruited the posterior cerebellar Crus II and the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) more. Faster response times were correlated with less Crus II activation and with more TPJ activation, suggesting that the Crus II supported automatizing the belief sequence while the TPJ supported inferring the protagonists' beliefs. Also as hypothesized, compared with an implicit version of the Belief SRT task (i.e., participants did not know about the existence of sequences; Ma, Pu, et al., 2021b), the cerebellar Crus I &II was engaged less during initial training and automatic application of the sequence, and the cortical TPJ was activated more in processing random sequences.

Indexed as

LearningMentalizationCerebellumHumansReaction TimeSocial CognitionCerebellumExplicit sequence learningFalse beliefSerial reaction time taskSocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID34811709
OpenAlexW3217599448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.